|
|
[Tempatan]
Tak wajib vaksin utk kanak2 ke sekolah .....yer lo dah tak potent vaksin, ambik
[Copy link]
|
|
|
cegah ke jadah kalau dah vaksin asyik tak potent je ....dah bagi berdose2 pun dok di jangkiti gakkk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 08:53 PM
yg miliki vest boleh test tengok berfungsi dgn baik ke idak ..... boh kat penyangkut kemudian hang kan lalu tembak laaa tengok lut ke dak peluru...
Vaksin mana boleh test sendiri plak utk tahu dgn pasti potent ke idak , berfungsi ke idak ..... tak sama dgn vest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 11:32 PM
Kau tahu dak yg syarikat vaksin test vaksin pada bayi2 mcm tikus putih ?
Kau ok ke pakai produk hasil dari puluhan nyawa bayi melayang tu ?
Ketika masih diperingkat proses evaluation vaksin lagi , dah 36 bayi mati serta ribuan bayi mengalami kecederaan kerananya ......
walau mulanya Glaxosmithkline ngaku 14 bayi je mati, tapi internal dokumen yg dah bocor tunjukkan 36 mati sebenarnya dlm tempoh 2009 hingga 2011.... clinical trial di buat pada ribuan bayi waktu tu di argentina dan ribuan mengalami kecederaan ....makna bayi jadi tikus putih je pada syarikat vaksin tu,
Dan sejak vaksin tu diperkenalkan 73 kanak2 mati keseluruhannya.
GSK tetap nafikan gakk vaksin penyebabnya, walau ada kes bayi2 yg dlm tempoh 24 dapat vaksin trus mati .
=======================================
Leaked internal documents show 36 babies died after receiving this vaccine
01/09/2019 / By Vicki Batts
Just when you thought the vaccine industry couldn’t get any more depraved, they go and prove you wrong. Recently leaked, confidential documents have revealed that at least 36 infants died following the administration of an 6-in-1 vaccine manufactured by pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline. These tragic deaths took place over the course of just two years.
Initiative Citoyenne, a Belgium-based vaccine activism network, reports that the 1200-page document revealed thousands of adverse reactions occurred during the evaluations which took place between 2009 and 2011. While GlaxoSmithKline’s official report declares that only 14 children died during the 2-year period, Initiative Citoyenne (IC) reports that their own analysis of the data indicates a much higher death toll, closer to 36. IC reports that at least 73 children have died since the Infanrix Hexa vaccine made its debut in 2000.
Shocking confidential document reveals wave of infant death
Reading the report, which can be viewed as a PDF here, it is clear that GSK has no real concern for its highly probable involvement in the deaths of multiple children. Under section 6.4.1, “Cases with a Fatal Outcome,” one can read about the 14 children GSK admits died post-vaccination during the 2009-2011 evaluation period.
Naturally, every single death is waved off. Most of these children died within just a few days after receiving the Infanrix Hexa shot, with a staggering number dying within one day. Even when a child dies within 24 hours of receiving the vaccine, the company comments that “No adverse events were reported after vaccinations.” Apparently death isn’t an adverse event to these people.
Under section 6.4.1, Case B0605003A is described. The report reads:
This case was reported by the Italian regulatory authority and described the occurrence of cardiac arrest in a 2-month-old female who was vaccinated with an unspecified dose of Infanrix hexa™ on 10 August 2009. Less than one day after vaccination, the subject experienced convulsions. The subject was hospitalised from 14 August until 19 August 2009. At the time of reporting, the event was resolved with sequelae. Last convulsion episode was on 18 October 2009. The baby showed a regular growth but a light motor retardation in respect of the age. Her weight was 7.10 kg. Diagnostic tests as karyotype, ultrasonography, computerized axial tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance were negative. She was treated with Luminalette. According to the follow up information received on 01 June 2010, the subject died due to a cardiac arrest at an unspecified time after vaccination.
The company responded to this by calling it a “Case of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI).”
Every time a child dies after being vaccinated, the industry insists it’s just a “sudden death.” There are multiple accounts of healthy, happy babies dying within just 24 hours of vaccination. And yet, GSK continues to assert that these deaths are somehow “natural,” or causeless, and not a direct result of injecting delicate newborns with half a dozen different viral strains, aluminum adjuvants and a bevy of other hazardous ingredients.
https://vaccinedeaths.com/2019-01-09-leaked-internal-documents-show-36-babies-died-vaccine.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 09:30 PM
nyawa bayi di buat mcm nyawa ayam je oleh syarikat pembuat vaksin , depa tarak rasa belas kasinan langsung.....
kalau depa boleh test camtu di argentina , dan tak peduli nasib bayi2 yg jadi bahan ujikaji depa..... awat depa nak peduli nasib anak2 hampa plak ?
Tak mustahil kah kalau depa jadikan bayi di argentina bahan ujikaji, depa jugak boleh buat gitu kat anak hampa haaa ? 
Argentina dan malaysia samalah taraf yakni bukan mcm negara maju yg ada undang2 utk halang perkara tu dari berlaku ...... malah kalau jadi kematian ke injury ke depa bukan perlu bayar sesen pun kalau buat test kat malaysia kan kan kan .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaksin je la. Duit boleh cari.., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 09:44 PM
nyawa anak kalau melayang setelah di vaksin ? Kalau alami vaksin injury ? ....dari sihat kepada mati , atau cedera atau cacat kekal .....kenapa nak ambik risiko ? Syarikat vaksin takkan bayar sesen pun walau apa berlaku, kerajaan pun tak pernah bayar sesen pun malah tak pernah peduli nak ambil tahu pepe pung setelah di cucuk .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 09:49 PM
mati ke , cedera serius ke, cacat kekal ke, apa saja allergic reaction lepas di cucuk vaksin .... parents tanggung sendiri blaka2 ......sapa tak peduli...... di tambah plak dah ada bukti ia tak effective utk cegah penyakit berjangkit pun.... jadi kenapa masih nak anak di vaksin ? Boleh provide explanation ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 09:53 PM
Aku pernah tengok bayi yg lepas di vaksin mak dia perlu tukar berbagai susu tetap gatal2 gak satu badan ...
last2 amek susu soya baru ok....errr sihat ka bayi minum susu soya ?
Tapi nak buat camne dah susu lain habih tak leh sebab gatal merah satu badan kerana allergic reaction.
Padahal sebelum di vaksin elok je minum susu formula.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blastoff replied at 6-3-2019 08:46 PM
cegah ke jadah kalau dah vaksin asyik tak potent je ....dah bagi berdose2 pun dok di jangkiti gakkk ...
Ngko hada kena ke semua penyakit tu? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blastoff replied at 6-3-2019 09:19 PM
Kau tahu dak yg syarikat vaksin test vaksin pada bayi2 mcm tikus putih ?
Kau ok ke pakai produ ...
Amik info dari site antivax kokesen, sah2 gini la jalam cerita. Cuba bandingkan bilangan yang mati dan survive? Hada figure tuh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tak... melainkan difteria ....sembuh ok je.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blastoff replied at 6-3-2019 09:54 PM
tak... melainkan difteria ....sembuh ok je.
Ha, hokeh la tu. So hapa yang ngkau nak anti vaksin sangat? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semua vaksin ada waning effect, takde org boleh tahu brp lama vaksin itu effective in the body.
Cuma sape2 dpt natural infection dari measles mump and rubella akan dpt lifelong immunity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pliss cikgu.
zaman hang tuah dgn hang li po dulu kan takde vaksin.
bg arr sheol kembalikan kegemilangan itew 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 11:35 PM
Ni media antarabangsa melaporkan.... ia court kes hokayy .....bukti bayi2 dari negara membangun di guna sebagai bahan ujikaji oleh pembuat vaksin tanpa minta proper kebenaran dari parents pun.
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
GlaxoSmithKline fined over trials on the babies of Argentinian poor
GlaxoSmithKline, Britain's biggest drug firm, has been fined by an Argentine court over clinical trials of a pneumonia vaccine which was tested on thousands of babies from poor families.  GlaxoSmithKline fined over trials on poor babies Photo: AFP
9:44AM GMT 11 Jan 2012
The firm failed to get proper consent from the children’s parents before injecting Synflorix, one of its bestselling vaccines, according to a judge in Buenos Aires.
GSK was also criticised for keeping inadequate records of the children’s ages, medical histories and previous jabs.
Evidence from Argentina's medical regulator said that, in a few cases, scientists working for GSK relied on permission from under-age parents or illiterate grandparents, The Times reported.
GSK and two of the scientists who led the trial have been fined a total of one million pesos (£150,000).
Jorge Yabkowsky, president of the Argentine Federation of Health Professionals, told The Times: “These are people who depend entirely on the state apparatus and who are most often illiterate.
“They are vulnerable sections of society. They are unable to read any kind of consent form. GSK's recruitment of these people was absolutely unethical.”
The trial, known as Compas, involved 15,000 Argentine babies and 9,000 in Colombia and Panama.
The study began five years ago and is continuing. Such work is central to a strategy laid out by Sir Andrew Witty, the chief executive of GSK, who has emphasised vaccines in developing countries as a commercial priority.
Sir Andrew, who was knighted in the New Year Honours, wants to diversify away from "white pills in Western markets", The Times reported.
GSK paid scientists carrying out the study for each baby signed up. Families were given no financial incentives.
A GSK spokesman said: “We conduct clinical trials to the same high standards, irrespective of where in the world they are run. This includes the requirement to obtain informed consent from participants. That is a fundamental principle of our behaviour and any deviation is unacceptable.
“In this case, we proactively alerted the authorities and implemented a corrective action plan. The Argentinian authorities agreed to continue with the study.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news ... gentinian-poor.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by Victorioussss at 6-3-2019 10:07 PM
blastoff replied at 6-3-2019 07:47 PM
dah terbukti depa tak boleh lindungi diri depa pung dari kena penyakit tu walau setelah di vaksin ...
Kau pk sng je la daripada artikel2 y kau post tu
Divaksin pn kene, kalu xvaksin ,au mati terus agaknya
Sblm jadi bodoh, tau dlu apetu sistem pertahanan badan dan ape tu vasin
Vaksin ni bakteria penyakit yang dah dilemahkan
Sistem pertahanan badan ni self learning. Kalu first time dia encounter bakteria baru, dia akan slow sikit sbb nk kenal pasti bakteria ni kawan atau musuh serta nk carik jalan mcm mana nak attack bateria tu. Jalan A xdapat, dorg try jalan B dam seterusnya
Efek dia, tempoh nak penyembuhan tu makan masa lama..dan masa tu la y penting sbb penyakit tu lagi cepat merebak bile sistem pertahan badan terlalu slow, sebab spesis bakteria yang first time encounter xde lagi dalam codex pertahanan badan
So kat sini la vaksin tu bagus. Idea oleh ibnusina pakai perubatan dan org Islam. Menulis kitab perubatan y masih jadi bahan rujukan kat havard med dan uk
Vaksin ni bakteria yang dah lembik. Cucuk dalam badan dan badan detect ade bakteria
Sistem pertahanan akan blaja pasal bakteria ni dan register dalam codex ttg cara nak attack. Sebabkan bakteria ni dah lembik asalnya, jadi untuk dia merebak dlm badan tu xde dan senanf dikalahkan oleh sistem pertahanan
Jadi next time bile badan kau dpt balik bateria yang sama versi original dan kuat, sistem pertahanan dah senang nak kenal pasti awal2 dan tau cara attack y berkesan dari pengalaman dlu
Soalan kau kenapa dah vaksin pn kene lg? Xpotent?
Bakteria ni hidupan..dia berevolusi. Bakteria y dlu dibelajar dari vaksin mgkin dah evolve dgn ciri2 lain y lagi power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 10:10 PM
bayi2 B40 dimalaysia tu dgn bayi2 rakyat miskin di argentina apa beza ? PH lagi laa korup kaw kaw..... kalau syarikat vaksin bagi duit kat lge ke atau waytha ke je truih laa depa relaaa di buat bahan ujikaji ler gamaknya anak2 B40 org2 melayu ? Buat senyap2 ? Mana mungkin nak riuhkan kan kan 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
theoretically vaccine nampak bagus tapi apa yg berlaku dlm bdn tak ada mana2 scientist yg boleh 100% sure apa yg berlaku.
So it is debatable.. pro vaksin tolong jgn jumud sgt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 6-3-2019 11:37 PM
Ni bukan website antivax hokayyy....... ia website mengenai teknologi farmasi ......
nampak dak 14 bayi mati .... jumlah tu yg GSK ngaku formally sebab nak elak dari kena saman wang besar laaa lalu syarikat tu kata la 14 je... tapi leak documen tunjukkan dekat 40 yg mati sebenarnya.
modus operandi yg di guna adalah guna borang consent panjang nak mampus berpage2 yg tak difahami makpak tu ....kalau di buat kat malaysia anak2 B40 guna borang bahasa inggeris la kot kemudian buat lah bagi nampak academic kaw kaw camna nak paham kannn
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
10 January 2012
GlaxoSmithKline fined over controversial vaccine trials on Argentine babies
GlaxoSmithKline has been fined by an Argentine court over the management of clinical trials of its pneumonia vaccine Synflorix, which allegedly killed 14 babies.
The firm was fined $93,000 for failing to obtain parental consent to conduct the trials on 15,000 Argentine babies, and an additional 9,000 babies from Colombia and Panama, between 2007 and 2008.
The children were recruited from poor families. Evidence from Argentina’s medical regulator said that, in some cases, GlaxoSmithKline pressured parents and grandparents to sign lengthy consent forms that they couldn’t understand, the Times reported.
GlaxoSmithKline was also criticised by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky for keeping inadequate records of the children’s ages and medical histories.
It is unknown how many babies suffered serious side effects and adverse reactions from the injections, or if 14 is the true number of babies who died during the trials.
Aguinsky made his decision based on a report by the National Administration of Medicine, Food and Technology.
Synflorix is a paediatric pneumococcal vaccine designed to protect against life-threatening diseases such as meningitis and bacteraemic pneumonia.
The vaccine has been approved for use in Europe and the World Health Organization awarded a "prequalification for global use" of Synflorix in November 2009.
Image caption: GlaxoSmithKline, the biggest pharma firm in the UK, has been charged for the poor management of its Synflorix trials in Argentina.
https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/newsgsk-fined-over-controversial-vaccine-trials-on-argentinean-babies/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nampak ni the telegraph melaporkan clinical trial style gitu MASIH di teruskan ....
makna negara mana plak target depa utk jadikan bayi2 tikuih putih ?Yg paling korup sekarang ni malaysia laaa 10 menteri ka apa ka fake degreee 
Mind you , satu sen tak di bayar pepe pun ye pada parents di argentina yg anak2 depa mati atau sakit teruk kerananya.
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
The trial, known as Compas, involved 15,000 Argentine babies and 9,000 in Colombia and Panama.
The study began five years ago and is continuing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Author
Post time 6-3-2019 09:35 PM
![[KUIZ PERUBATAN MINGGUAN VOL. 7]: Mudah aje, ilmu harian! VOL.7](https://uf.cari.com.my/forumx/mforum/block/ca/cafa22106bf87ee6a0ff6b0584fea8d8.jpg)