Rajin rajin la report pada polis, sprm. Biar yang terlibat di dakwa .
Sekurang kurang nya big players macam Najib laki bini, Azeez, Kunan, Zahid, Musa Aman.. Isa Samad semua tu kegiatan mereka already stopped. So kalau LGE or anybody else yang kau rasa kuat rasuah atau money launderers yang masih berleluasa, report la .
Post time 9-3-2019 11:05 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
baghal_bortuqal replied at 9-3-2019 10:20 AM
Siapa paling kuat merasuah?
Siapa paling kuat money laundering: ie bridal shops mcm cendawan tumb ...
exactly sis. Dorang buat secara sistematik sebab dorang ada kapisiti dan fund to do it sejak BN lagi. They even get it regulated macam penghapusan gst. Terang-terang tapi sapa berani bising dah law pun dorang yg buat. Tinggallah melayu tersepit nak gerak. Tu pasal cina hairan kalau melayu nampak kaya.
Post time 9-3-2019 02:13 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Edited by pyropura at 9-3-2019 02:21 PM
Macam polisi kita bagi business pada Bumi saja tanpa meletakkan kualiti sebagai prioriti tu bahaya gak utk long term. Sepatutnya pengusaha2 Bumi yang berkualiti tu dibela dan diutamakan utk next projects, manakala pengusaha Bumi yg hampeh dicampak lubok jah atau disuruh gabung buat konsortium.
Post time 9-3-2019 02:20 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
cmf_BeachBoys replied at 9-3-2019 05:25 AM
Isu Venezuela ni sebenarnya takde sangat kaitan dengan socialization atau isu Hugo Chavez membudayak ...
Simon Bolivar hero depa yg pegi perang lawan penjajah Sepanyol tu pun kan pendatang juga. Banyak yg tak betul stetmen ko nih. Aku penah duk Venezuela hampir setahun lar.
The CIA Was Involved In the Coup Against Venezuela's Chavez
The White House and the State Department both claimed that the Chávez government had provoked violence and actions that resulted in the President’s alleged resignation in April 2002. Investigations have provided a plethora of evidence proving the U.S. involvement in the coup on various levels.
On April 12, 2002, White House spokesperson Ari Fleischer stated:
“Let me share with you the administration's thoughts about what's taking place in Venezuela. It remains a somewhat fluid situation. But yesterday's events in Venezuela resulted in a change in the government and the assumption of a transitional authority until new elections can be held.
The details still are unclear. We know that the action encouraged by the Chavez government provoked this crisis. According to the best information available, the Chavez government suppressed peaceful demonstrations.
Government supporters, on orders from the Chavez government, fired on unarmed, peaceful protestors, resulting in 10 killed and 100 wounded.
The Venezuelan military and the police refused to fire on the peaceful demonstrators and refused to support the government's role in such human rights violations. The government also tried to prevent independent news media from reporting on these events.
The results of these events are now that President Chavez has resigned the presidency. Before resigning, he dismissed the vice president and the cabinet, and a transitional civilian government has been installed. This government has promised early elections.
The United States will continue to monitor events. That is what took place, and the Venezuelan people expressed their right to peaceful protest. It was a very large protest that turned out. And the protest was met with violence.”
On that same day, U.S. Department of State spokesperson Philip T. Reeker, claimed:
“In recent days, we expressed our hopes that all parties in Venezuela, but especially the Chavez administration, would act with restraint and show full respect for the peaceful expression of political opinion. We are saddened at the loss of life. We wish to express our solidarity with the Venezuelan people and look forward to working with all democratic forces in Venezuela to ensure the full exercise of democratic rights. The Venezuelan military commendably refused to fire on peaceful demonstrators, and the media valiantly kept the Venezuelan public informed.
Yesterday's events in Venezuela resulted in a transitional government until new elections can be held. Though details are still unclear, undemocratic actions committed or encouraged by the Chavez administration provoked yesterday's crisis in Venezuela. According to the best information available, at this time: Yesterday, hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans gathered peacefully to seek redress of their grievances. The Chavez Government attempted to suppress peaceful demonstrations. Chavez supporters, on orders, fired on unarmed, peaceful protestors, resulting in more than 100 wounded or killed. Venezuelan military and police refused orders to fire on peaceful demonstrators and refused to support the government's role in such human rights violations. The government prevented five independent television stations from reporting on events. The results of these provocations are: Chavez resigned the presidency. Before resigning, he dismissed the Vice President and the Cabinet. A transition civilian government has promised early elections.
We have every expectation that this situation will be resolved peacefully and democratically by the Venezuelan people in accord with the principles of the Inter-American Democratic Charter. The essential elements of democracy, which have been weakened in recent months, must be restored fully. We will be consulting with our hemispheric partners, within the framework of the Inter-American Democratic Charter, to assist Venezuela.”[ii]
Why re-cite these statements here? These statements from the highest levels of the U.S. Government show the prepared version of the events that took place during the April 11-12 coup d’etat against Venezuelan President Chávez. Moreover, these revealing statements now prove, in light of documents recently obtained from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), that this prepared version of events was knowingly false and made with the intention of deceiving the international community in order to justify a violent overthrow of a democratic government.
The White House and the State Department both claimed that the Chávez government had provoked violence and actions that resulted in the President’s alleged resignation. They also asserted that the Chávez government had fired on unarmed, peaceful protesters and that the Venezuelan military and police had refused orders to “support the government’s role in human rights violations”. The U.S. Government referred to the protests and actions of that day as though they were spontaneous, unplanned events. The U.S. Government has also continued to deny to this day any involvement whatsoever in the April 2002 coup d’etat.
However, there is a vast amount of evidence that has surfaced since the coup demonstrating that the events on April 11, 2002 were entirely premeditated by a sector of the opposition intent on overthrowing the Chávez government. Furthermore, my own investigations have provided a plethora of evidence proving the U.S. involvement in the coup on various levels. Most revealing on the Venezuelan front was a news program on Saturday morning, April 12, 2002, “24 Horas” with host Napoleon Bravo. On that program, Bravo interviewed Vice-Admiral Carlos Molina Tamayo, a professed coup leader, and Victor Manuel Garcia, Director of the polling company CIFRA who claimed to have represented the “civil society” during the coup. Both Molina Tamayo and Garcia gave a jaw-dropping, detailed account of the events leading up to the coup and those key Venezuelans involved, including crediting the private televisions stations for their complicity and aide. Their testimony, along with Chacao municipal mayor Leopoldo Lopez of the Primero Justicia political party and Napoleon Bravo’s own admissions of complicity in the coup, provided plenty of proof that the overthrow of Chávez was a premeditated event.
Later, an extraordinary and award-winning documentary by filmmaker Angel Palacios, “Puente Llaguno: Claves de un Masacre”, revealed how the Venezuelan private media had manipulated and distorted the events that unfolded on April 11, 2002 in the opposition march, which resulted in widespread violence and death. The documentary also provided sufficient proof that snipers unrelated to the Chávez government had provoked the violence in the opposition march that justified the forced removal of Chávez from office. Furthermore, the documentary succeeded in proving that a well-planned military-civilian coup d’etat had taken place that day and that those involved were connected to the highest levels of the U.S. government.
But the evidence of actual U.S. involvement in the coup itself remained scarce up until recently. On www.venezuelafoia.info, I have posted hundreds of documents that evidence the intricate financing scheme the U.S. government has been carrying out in Venezuela since 2001, that includes financing well over twenty million dollars to opposition sectors. The funding of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a quasi-governmental entity in the U.S. financed entirely by Congress and established by congressional legislation in 1983, has provided more than three million dollars since late 2001 to opposition groups, many of which were key participants in the April 2002 coup. And in June 2002, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), set up an Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) in the U.S. Embassy in Caracas, allegedly for the purposing of helping Venezuela to resolve its political crisis. The OTI in Caracas has counted on more than fifteen million dollars in funding from Congress since June 2002 and has recently requested five million more for 2005, despite the fact that it was only supposed to be a two-year endeavor. All evidence obtained to date shows that the OTI has primarily funded opposition groups and projects in Venezuela, particularly those that were focused on the August 15, 2004 recall referendum against President Chávez.
I have written other articles explaining the intervention model applied through NED and USAID in Venezuela. This method of intervention is very sophisticated and complex, as it penetrates civil society and social organizations in a very subtle way and is often either undetectable or flimsily justified by the concept of “promoting democracy”, which is what the NED claims to do around the world, despite evidence to the contrary. The mere fact in Venezuela that the NED has financed exclusively anti-Chávez groups and those very same organizations that were involved in the April 2002 coup shows that “democracy” is far from the NED’s intention.
But the CIA intervention in Venezuela is of the crudest, simplest kind. Top secret documents recently obtained and posted on www.venezuelafoia.infoshow that in the weeks prior to the April 2002 coup against President Chávez, the CIA had full knowledge of the events to occur and, in fact, even had the detailed plans in their possession. An April 6, 2002 top secret intelligence brief headlining “Venezuela: Conditions Ripening for Coup Attempt”, states, “Dissident military factions, including some disgruntled senior officers and a group of radical junior officers, are stepping up efforts to organize a coup against President Chávez, possible as early as this month, [CENSORED]. The level of detail in the reported plans – [CENSORED] targets Chávez and 10 other senior officers for arrest…” The document further states, “To provoke military action, the plotters may try to exploit unrest stemming from opposition demonstrations slated for later this month…”[iii]
So the CIA knew that a coup attempt would take place soon after April 6, 2002, and moreover, they knew the plan would include Chávez’s arrest and an exploitation of violence in the opposition march. In other words, they knew the plans before the coup occurred and surely they knew the actors involved, many of whose names are probably in the censored parts of the top-secret documents. One could assume that if the CIA had the detailed plans in their possession in the weeks prior to the coup it was because they were associating and conspiring with the coup plotters. So, when Ari Fleischer and Philip Reeker made those statements on April 12, 2002 on behalf of the U.S. Government, they did so with full knowledge that a coup had taken place, Chávez had been arrested and the violence in the opposition march, which they attributed to Chávez, had actually been a premeditated part of the coup plot. The top secret documents that prove this information show they were sent to the U.S. Statement Department and the National Security Agency, which means frankly, the White House knew what was happening all along.
Furthermore, the CIA documents make no mention of any attempts to have Chávez forcibly resign from office. The CIA warnings indicated as early as March 5, 2002 (which is the date of the earliest document provided) that a coup was on the rise and even hinted that prospects for a successful coup were limited. The CIA rightfully felt the opposition was too disperse and divided to successfully overthrow Chávez. But the concept that Chávez had “resigned” as the White House and State Department “confirmed” on April 12, 2002 was merely a set-up, a false claim made with the intention of deceiving the U.S. public and the international community. Remember that the U.S. stood practically alone in the world in its endorsement of the coup-implemented Carmona Government, which it later weakly condemned but only after the coup came tumbling down and the U.S. realized it needed to save face quickly.
A top secret CIA document from April 14, 2002 shows concern that Latin American governments will view U.S. foreign policy as “hypocritical” because of its sole endorsement of the Carmona coup government. The CIA also seems surprised that the region of Latin America so quickly rejected the coup in Venezuela and that the Carmona government “stunningly collapsed”, which demonstrates a possible out-of-date view of the hemisphere and a failure in intelligence gathering and analysis. In fact, the CIA never imagined the coup would buckle because of support for Chávez – their analysis all along showed possible failure due to lack of opposition unity and hasty actions. This is a very important point, because it demonstrates that although the CIA was involved in the coup plotting and the collaborations with dissident military factions and opposition leaders, it was fairly detached from the reality of Venezuelan society.
The CIA’s intelligence failures in Venezuela were apparently repeated during the oil industry strike later in 2002 and the guarimba destabilization attempt, an old-school CIA tactic applied in Chile and Nicaragua. Both of these harsh actions injured the Venezuelan economy and affected the government’s international image, but failed in their goal to oust President Chávez. The NED’s and USAID’s tens of millions of dollars in financing to build and maintain the opposition movement and finance the recall referendum campaign against President Chávez also failed to achieve their mission. In fact, all of these bungled attempts by the U.S. government and its marionette opposition movement have served to strengthen Chávez’s support within Venezuela and paint him as a strong and solid international leader.
Now that some of the top-secret documents have surfaced that show the CIA’s complicity and involvement in the April 2002 coup, it leaves one to wonder what is next on the agenda. In September 2001, shortly after the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, President Bush unconditionally authorized former CIA Director George Tenet’s “Worldwide Attack Matrix”, which targets leaders and prominent figures in 80 countries around the world for assassination. The authorization of the Worldwide Attack Matrix provided the CIA with a virtual carte blanche to conduct political assassinations abroad, justified under the “war against terrorism”. The “Attack Matrix”, a top secret CIA document, authorizes an array of covert CIA anti-terror actions that range from “routine propaganda to lethal covert action in preparation for military attacks”.[iv] The plans give the CIA the broadest and most lethal authority in history. Some analysts have indicated that Venezuela is possibly included in the plans.
The recent assassination of Venezuelan Prosecutor Danilo Anderson, conducted in a style reminiscent of CIA operations, could be setting the stage for future political murders. History shows that when the CIA fails to remove a target via non-lethal means, more desperate measures are taken. Despite the fact that the Venezuelan government and its supporters appear to have foiled the CIA numerous times already over the past few years, vigilance, intelligence and increased security measures should become a priority.
Russia sends two nuclear-capable bombers to Venezuela
MOSCOW — Two Russian nuclear-capable strategic bombers arrived in Venezuela on Monday, a deployment that comes amid soaring Russia-U.S. tensions.
Russia's Defense Ministry said a pair of Tu-160 bombers landed at Maiquetia airport outside Caracas on Monday following a 6,200-mile flight. It didn't say whether the bombers were carrying any weapons and didn't say how long they would stay in Venezuela.
The ministry said the bombers were shadowed by Norwegian F-18 fighter jets during part of their flight. It added that a heavy-lift An-124 Ruslan cargo plane and an Il-62 passenger plane accompanied the bombers to Maiquetia.
The Tu-160 can carry conventional or nuclear-tipped cruise missiles with a range of 3,410 miles. Such bombers took part in Russia's campaign in Syria, where they launched conventionally armed Kh-101 cruise missiles for the first time in combat.
Code-named Blackjack by NATO, the massive warplane is capable of flying at twice the speed of sound. Russia has upgraded its Tu-160 fleet with new weapons and electronics, and it plans to produce a modernized version of the bomber.
The bombers' deployment follows Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's visit to Moscow last week to shore up political and economic assistance even as his country has been struggling to pay billions of dollars owed to Russia.
Russia is a major political ally of Venezuela, which has become increasingly isolated in the world under growing sanctions led by the United States and the European Union, which accuse Maduro of undermining democratic institutions to hold onto power while overseeing an economic and political crisis that is worse than the Great Depression.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at last week's meeting with his Venezuelan counterpart, Vladimir Padrino Lopez, that Russia would continue to send its military aircraft and warships to visit Venezuela as part of bilateral military cooperation.
Russia sent its Tu-160 strategic bombers and a missile cruiser to visit Venezuela in 2008 amid tensions with the United States after Russia's brief war with Georgia. A pair of Tu-160s also visited Venezuela in 2013.
Russian-U.S. relations are at post-Cold War lows over Ukraine, the war in Syria and allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election. Russia has bristled at the United States and other NATO allies for deploying their troops and weapons near its borders.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Twitter that delivery of the planes exemplified "two corrupt governments squandering public funds, and squelching liberty and freedom while their people suffer."
Asked about the Russian bombers, Col. Rob Manning, a spokesman for the Defense Department, said he had no specific information.
However, Manning cited the humanitarian assistance provided in Central and South American by a U.S. Navy hospital ship, the USNS Comfort, in the past eight weeks. Numerous Venezuelan migrants were among the people who received medical and dental treatment.
"Contrast this with Russia, whose approach to the manmade disaster in Venezuela is to send bomber aircraft instead of humanitarian assistance," Manning said.
Author|Post time 10-3-2019 10:58 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Dey lobai.
Conspiracy tu semua irrelevant. Mana hubung kait ranapnya ekonomi Venezuela?
Asas kpd ranapnya ekonomi Venezuela ialah objektif utopia ke arah sosialisme, Dan pemangkin kehancuran ekonominya ialah dasar populis sabsidi melampau berpaksikan 'hak' rakyat. Pelaksana proses kehancuran ialah puak pemerintah (politaik) yg bodo Dan cas bagus.
Dan ini semua sepupu baghal si siskabu dah cakap dari 9 tahun lepas.
Similarity politaik di tampuk pemerintah Malaysia dgn puak bodoh sombong yg meranapkan ekonomi Venezuela tu Pon mmg Ada. Banyak:
1. Sumber kekayaan negara di jarah (khazanah, petronas, tabung haji).
2. Productive talent negara dibuang, diaibkan (azman mokhtar). Tutop teraju.
3. Pelaksanaan dasar ekonomi yg bukan bermanfaat utk rakyat:
- GST ke SST 395,000 syarikat terlepas,
- Entah berapa ramai individu tak declare income tax terlepas dari GST: perempuan simpanan, pemakan rasuah, money launderer, gangster, pengedar dadah, etc.
- SST dikecualikan utk pemaju hartanah,
- Diskaun utk Levi pekerja asing, majikan diberi pelepasan dari bayar levi 100% kpd hanya bayar 20%, 80% sibangla bayr sendiri, dibagi lagi extension 3 tahun bilamana patutnya tenagakerja asing dihantar pulang lepas 10 tahun.
- Ura2 utk menyatukan perkeso dgn kwsp, sbb kwsp duit banyak Dan perkeso duit tak cukup dari caruman.
- Pemotongan kos membuta tuli lrt3, mrt3.
- Insurance mysalam: GE bagi 2 billion tapi dot balik 60juta untung lepas 5 tahun. Dan GE diberi pelepasan untuk kekal 100% milik singapura utk 'bantuan' kpd kerajaan. Dan bila disoal ttg isu PDPA (data 3 jota Malaysians yg bukan pelanggan GE jatuh ke tangan GE, menteri bangang tu cakap itu Tak jadi issue sbb gomen backstop kpd GE. Gomen uruskan semua Hal mysalam, bukan GE.) Which begs the question, the fuck is GE being paid 60million for?
4. Penipuan dalamana meratib hiba duit takde sebok nak melaksanakan projek kereta ketiga, kereta terbang, epot kulim, highway ke baling.
5. Cas bagus pembentangan bajet dgn projection minyak purata USD 70, perkembangan ekonomi mapan, pertambahan komitment pembayaran interest atas utang gomen (walopon setelah segala perancangan penjarahan kantung petronas utk mengurangkan hutang).
6. Kadar hutang negara yg terus meningkat, apa kes?
7. 'Berjaya' buat hutang baru dlmbentuk samurai bonds.
Perkara ketujuh ni menarik utk dikupas.
Memola, engkau cakap utang negara 1 trillion pakai definisi sendiri yg gomen seluruh dunia Tak pakai.
Lepas tu, engkau terus naikkan kadar hutang.
Sekarang pulak, engkau naikkan pulak kadar hutang luar negara.
Apa sial? Against backdrop of still massively bloated central bank balance sheets from QE yg memegang satu risiko of flows back to US/Europe, engkau berterusan menaikkan kadar hutang negara Dan hutang luar negara?
Buku tarabaca ka deyy. 98 Asian financial crisis. Overseas debt, high debt. Dasar bangang Tak boleh diajar.
It is exactly this sort of stupidity yg sekarang ni buat baghal risau. Bimbang.
Yahudi2 Goldman ka, cucu Soros ka will always be round somewhere. But on their turf. Kita stay on our turf sudahla. But no. You have to take the country to go and play in their turf (samurai bonds).
hutang berbeliyon dah dibuat pon.
skang musim bayar hutang.
mcm zaman atok muda2 dulu, terlalu rakus.
bila paklah dok bayar hutang, masing2 tuduh paklah 'tido'
sama yg jd hari nih.
negara tgh terbeban hutang, gomen cuma bleh pikir
mcm mn cara nak byr hutang.
terpaksa cut cost sana sini dan buat hutang lg utk kambus hutang.
mcm zaman paklah jugak, rakyat akan salahkan nape ekonomi suram??
nape dok bayar hutang?? takde keje lain ka??
tapi,
cukup la najib je ajar paklah "jgn tido" katanya.
nak pembangunan? panggil china jarah tanahair...
nak duit?? taburr brimm...
...anak cucu? lantak pi dorang pandai2 la.
gomen hari nih terpaksa starts from scratch.
pelan2 kayuh.
Post time 11-3-2019 10:40 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Kepada mahacai baca lah post #30 dari @baghal_botuqal tu aku pun pelik, najib yg bagus tu korang kata tak bagus, walhal dia buat hutang dgn glc spt kwsp, kwap, ltat, pnb, khazanah, petronas dll, datang atok, org tua nyannyok ni pergi jepun buat hutang bond samurai dalam yen yg very volatile ....dia ingat jepun sekarang ekonomi ke dua besar lagi ke macam tahun 80 dan 90 an walhal china bukit dah took over dah.....bila hutang dalam foreign currency dia punya fluctuation ikut that currency against RM, tu ke korang mahacai kata atok , LGE, azmin tu pandai? Balik2 reshuah ku nan, azeez , najib dll...open your eyes lah macha, najib is much better in developing our economy sampai kita jadi resilient masa krisis ekonomi 2009? Balik2 hutang 1 trilion yg tak pakai idicator bank donia punya kira hutang negara, semata2 nak main propaganda kpd kerajaan lama....hahahajaha mahacai memang bodoh bila LGE buat belanjawan based on rega minyak 70 usd, walhal najib kata patutnya dia kena lebih conservative guna rega minyak 40 usd, tu belum lg jarah kantong petronas buat bayar tax refund 19 bil yg mana dalam laporan audit negara kata malaun2 tu submit claim yg tak lengkap, camna gomen nak bayar? Tu pun mahacai percaya LGE.....adoi.....bodoh lah yg undi pakatan.....
kalau baca artikel2 panjang venezuela tu mesti ada jumpa phrase 'economic mismanagement'. gitu la gayanya kerajaan ph tadbir negara sekarang.
dgn glc dah mcm year end sale, jual aset murah2 mcm tak cukup cash, dgn glc2 yg rugi lagi. dgn import makin nak sama level dgn eksport. petronas tu, puluh2 bilion govt ambik, apa je yg tinggal utk cari projek2 baru. khazanah yg rugi pun blh lge mangkuk tu ambik dividen 1.5 bilion. bykkkkk lg la
zaman najib masa pembangkang serang 1mdb. dlm negara, luar negara highlight negara bakal bankrap sbb hutang 1mdb. masa tu myr jatuh, pelabur lari, 1mdb sampai kena buat full settlement utk certain hutangnya. aman2 je kita survive dgn projek2 mega otw.
zaman ph? nangis la korang tengok gaya puak2 ni try nak settle masalah2 ekonomi ni. elok soros & geng serang je myr, baru ada akal puak2 yg membacking kerajaan sekarang ni.
dan elok jugak rakyat malaysia bank run kan th dgn asb, asn semua tu. lagiiiiiii baru ada akal puak2 yg membacking ph tu. kita tengok mcm mn govt yg memanjang mintak duit dgn glc2 tu nak top up saving2 yg glc2 tu hilang. tu belum lg bank2 lain tu. lg elok, pemiutang2 asing pun mintak full settlement. mesti meriah giler masa tu.
hujung2, solutionnya, entah2 menteri2 bodo ph buat press statement, duduk berhimpit atas sofa sambil nangis2 kesat air mata.
salah kerajaan najib katanya sbb tinggal hutang byk sgt.
Legasi mendiang Hugo Chavez, lepastu Maduro pulak gila kuasa. Dah jadi level bankrupsi lebih teruk dari Greece.
Ada ke patut Maduro claim cryptocurrency boleh selamatkan negara dia? Matawang crypto rejim Maduro iaitu Petro lebih bernilai berbanding Bolivar katanya. Masalahnya sekarang, cryptos takde legal binding dan takde regulation and sangat volatile. Lebih baik je pakai existing cryptos macam Bitcoin atau Ethereum.
Sekarang Venezuela dah berhutang banyak dengan China dan terpaksa bayar kepada China dengan barter petroleum. Minyak ada guna bayar hutang, cash takde jugak, lepastu berharap ke crypto atas angin. Jahanam model ekonomi cam ni.
Lepastu ada sekor Menteri PH dok jaja Harapan Coin? Apa ke jadah, baik kau promote Bitcoin je.
It wasn’t so long ago that Venezuela was the wealthiest nation in the entire of South America. Today, half of their population lives in extreme poverty. So, the question is… How did they end up there? What did their government do so wrong to destroy an economy in so little time? Today, we are gonna tell you the story.
Author
Post time 9-3-2019 10:55 AM
