Tuntutan Pindaan Perlembagaan oleh Kerajaan Sarawak : Persekutuan Malaya+Sabah+S

dodifarid

cmf_shalom replied at 18-6-2019 06:06 PM
Ko nk kami angkat senjata ke..? .. Baru puas hati.. Mcm tu..

Isu skrg bkaitan amanah....

Terpulang... Jika itu yang terbaik utk sarawak ..kami bersedia..

cmf_shalom

dodifarid replied at 18-6-2019 06:42 PM
Terpulang... Jika itu yang terbaik utk sarawak ..kami bersedia..

Xpe.. Org btamadun buat cara btamadun...

dodifarid

cmf_shalom replied at 18-6-2019 06:52 PM
Xpe.. Org btamadun buat cara btamadun...

Okey... Bg aku nak kata malaya langsung tak amanah tak tepat la.. Sbb di lihat dari kemajuan sarawak/sabah sekarang dgn kehebatan bandaraya Kuching dan KK , berbanding dgn negara di selatan dan timur sabah/sarawak tu,  yang rakyatnya ada yg terpaksa tidur di kubur2...memang sabah/ sarawak jauh ke hadapan.. Tapi utk melaksanakan semua perjanjian dgn sabah/sarawak tu malaya ada kekangan dan halangan tertentu..

Hatta negara British yang merangka perjanjian malaysia yang mereka rasa amat adil ni pun tak boleh tunaikan amanah dan keadilan yang depa pikul di negara mereka ..amanah dan keadilan kepada negara Scotland sampai sekarang british/london tak boleh tunaikan sepenuhnya.. Amanah sepanyol kepada Catalonia hingga sekarang tak sepenuhnya ditunaikan..apalah sangat negara membangun seperti malaya...

cmf_shalom

Parliamentary debates. Dewan Ra'ayat (House of Representatives)

Red Letter Day - Delegation from the United Kingdom House of Commons
2nd November 1963
Saturday


MOTION

ADDRESS OF THANKS TO HIS MAJESTY THE YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG (OPENING OF NEW PARLIAMENT HOUSE)

Sir John Barlow, M.P. (Conservative) (Leader of the Delegation from the United Kingdom House of Commons):

The Federation of the States of Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak and Sabah in Malaysia is the result of statemanship of the highest order, and creates a new State in the Commonwealth.

From the foundations laid in the past a new State is now emerging, and we assure you that although you are 8,000 miles from Britain we shall never forget you. Responsibility remains with us to help you in your years of maturity, and we hope that the Chair which we bring today symbolises the authority of democratic government.

This system of government has served Great Britain for centuries in the past. May it serve you for centuries to come.


Mr T. Fraser, M.P. (Labour) (Member of the Delegation from the United Kingdom):

Mr Speaker, the United Kingdom consists of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The people of those four countries did not always work together so amicably. Sir John Barlow is proud to be an Englishman. Equally, I am proud to be a Scotsman (Laughter). We are both proud to be citizens and servants of the United Kingdom.

England and Scotland came together more than 250 years ago by voluntary agreement. Our coming together, under one Government and one Parliament, has proved to be of mutual benefit to both countries and, we hope, of benefit to other Commonwealth countries too.

I have found it interesting to recall this development because you are also bringing together diverse peoples in Malaysia. And interesting too, because after all those years, Mr Speaker in our House of Commons still takes care to ensure that the voices of all the countries making up the United Kingdom are heard in debate.

No part of the whole community served by a Parliament should ever be given cause to feel that its point of view is unexpressed.








Aku tengah cari maklumat, sejak bila status Persekutuan Malaya sebgai 1 entiti perundangan tidak digunakan lagi dan mula dicairkan sehingga menyerap Sabh, Sarawak menjadi entiti baru....Dalam status Kerajaan UK..Akta Persekutuan Malaya 1957 masih lagi terpakai sehingga sekarang.

Selepas pembentukan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963, Persekutuan Malaya masih lagi dianggap sebagai 1 entiti oleh wakil UK yang datang ke Parlimen Malaya, malahan surat Tunku kepada Singapura pada tahun 1966 masih lagi meggunakan letterhead Perdana Menteri Persekutuan Malaya.

So, bila sebenarnya Persekutuan Malaya ini tertiba terbubar. Tapi aku jangka, semua ini berlaku sebaik sahaja Singapura keluar dari Malaysia.

Satu perkara misterius,Malaysia merupakan gabungan 4 wilayah, Persekutuan Malaya, Singapura, Sabah dan Sarawak-selepas Singapura keluar Malaysia pada tahun 1966, tetiba Persekutuan Malaya dicairkan, menyerap Sabah, Sarawak membentuk entiti baru di namakan Persekutuan, yang mana berdasarkan takrifan Perlembagaan sekarang, Persekutuan merujuk  negeri-negeri melayu yang membentuk Persekutuan Malaya pada 1957. Seolah-olah2 Sabah, Sarawak melantun ditarik ke tahun 1957!


Memandangkan,sehingga bulan April 2019, Kerajaan Persekutuan masih lagi keberatan memasukkan Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 ke dalam Perlembagaan, memandangkan Perlembagaan adalah Supreme, maka dari segi perundangan, Malaysia wujud dan berfungsi sekarang atas dasar apa?Sabah, Sarawak bukan pihak yang terlibat dengan Perjanjian 1957, maka atas alasan apa, berdasarkan Perlembagaan sekarang, Sarawak, Sarawak disedut terkait dengan tarikh tersebut.

Umpama, anda tidak pernah menghadiri mesyuarat 31 Ogos 1957 yang dibuat oleh syarikat X. Tetiba  anda yang dari syarikat Y, disebabkan anda lalu depan pintu syarikat x, anda dipaksa masuk dalam syarikat X dan dilayan macam anda salah seorang pekerja di syarikat x, sedangkan entiti syarikat anda iaitu Y, tidak sama dengan syarikat X.


Kerana itu, Kerajaan Sarawak melalui Motion yang dibentangkan di DUN Sarawak baru-baru ini menyindir Parlimen dengan penyatakan seperti berikut:

"Indeed, to not recognize the MA 63 in the Constitution is akin  to not recognizing the existence of the MA 63"




Skandal apa ni...

marla69

Hanya yang duduk di sarawak  jer tau apa yang kami dapat.  Terasa seperti di anaktiri. Pembangunan pesat?  Kalau tak, dedulu takkan orang sinun kata orang sini duduk atas pokok.  Nasib baik ada pemimpin yg tegas seperti arwah ketua menteri dulu.  Kalau dia masih ada banyak yang dapat diperbetul kan dengan segera..  

cmf_shalom

marla69 replied at 20-6-2019 10:47 AM
Hanya yang duduk di sarawak  jer tau apa yang kami dapat.  Terasa seperti di anaktiri. Pembangunan p ...

Kebiasaannya, segala kemunduran ni ditala berpunca dari salah kita...
Dah Sarawak ni bangsa paling pemurah baik kt dunia sampai ke surga, minyak kita sedekah kat Persekutuan:

Perjanjian PDA 1974 -dikuat kuasa dengan akta darurat yg berlaku pada 13 Mei...Malaya yang bertempur...laut sarawak yang terkorban. Nsib baik laut Sarawak tu x bertukar jadi darah.

Perintah darurat 13 Mei tu, setelah berpuluh tahun, baru 2012 dibatalkan.....Selama berpuluh tahun, sedap la Petronas menyedut minyak menggunakan perintah darurat, sedangkan, Ah Leong dengan Aminah, dah bercucu pun.

Kajian semula royalti setiap 5 tahun untuk Sarawak, selepas 1974-tidak pernah dibuat.

Itu x banding lagi, royalti yang diberikan oleh petronas kepada Persekutuan jauh beza dengan royalti yang diberikan kepasa Sarawak...bagai langit dengan bumi...sedangkan if ikut Perlembagaan, walaupun ko menyedut guna perintah darurat, Sarawak la yang lebih berhak dapat royalti..

Sebab  tu la Tun lahar Sarawak,nka naik royalti 20% ...Sarawak ko nakbunuh Petronas...? Jangan la...biar aku dan keturunann aku yg mencekik petronas..korg kan dah biasa duduk atas pokok..

Dana yang diperuntukan oleh British bagi tahun pertama dan kedua selepas 1963 untuk Sarawak-tidak pernah sampai kepada kita. Bhenti kat KL jak.

Berdasarkan Perlembagaan, bagi jumlah kutipan cukai tahunan persekutuan, 40% Kerajaan Persekutuan kena pulangkan balik kepada Sarawak..Habuk sejak 1963 memang x pernah di bagi balik.


Peruntukan pembangunan yang Sarawak dapat secara tahunan sama seperti Melaka, Pahang etc dapat, sedangkan Sarawak  seluas malaya


Masih lagi ramai pihak heren..kenapa Sarawak masih mundur erkkk? Duit buat sekolah, jalan korg songlap erkkkkk? ko x tau ke ah kak, kos projek untuk Sarawak lagi mahal dengan malaya, sebab faktor pengangkutan...Ni x cakap lagi dasar kabotaj aka sabotaj yg Tun perkenal..sebab nak up Pelabuhan Kelang...biar la rakyat Sarawak dicekik sebab nak lawan Pelabuhan Singapura.

Ini la konsep bersekutu bertambah mutuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu..

Simpanan tunai Kerajaan sarawak berjumlah sekitar 32 bilion tu pun disimpan kt Bank Negara..if nak pakai kita kena minta kebenaran. Nasib baik la baru sekarang Sarawak ada otak, baru pikir nak tubuh Bank Pembangunan Sarawak-supaya semua duit tu boleh dipindah dari Bank Negara ke Bank Pembangunan Sarawak.









perhhh..ini angka dari petronas....memang kompom la rakyat sarawak tinggal kubur if x masuk Malaysia-best pe kubur ada aircornd, berdinding emas dan belian...

cmf_shalom

Dari masa ke semasa..ak akan tepek kan dokumen sejarah..dah tiba masanya kita kena tau apa yg fakta..apa yg propaganda

Tpulang kepada masing2 nk intepretasi tujuan ak untuk apa?nak.cari kesalahan?nak tuding jari ?

Ya la...selama ni pun asyik kami kena tala

Aku tiada masalah if mmg berlaku kesilapan lampau...dh tiba masa untuk betulkan keadaan


Tp dlm bnyk keadaan..bila kami ungkit isu ketidak adilan dan menuntut hak..last3 kami kena jawan soklan cepu emas...x syg malaysia ka..x reti syukur ka...klu bukan malaya kompom korg bla bla bla.....apatah lagi melihat sikap kerajaan persekutuan seolah-olah mereka suka dengan keadaan tidak berpegang pada amanah sekarang..

Skrg...biar dokumen sejarah yg bcakap sendiri..

cmf_shalom

Sarawak memang xde pasukan elite askar..tp kami ada renjer hutan....dimana kepakaran mereka dlm hutan utk menewaskan komunis tiada siapa boleh pertikaikan

cmf_shalom

Bila x diungkit..ada yang fefeling dorg la Malaikat...ko la yang salah

Bila ungkit..mula la emosi

So biar sejarah jak yang bercakap

cmf_shalom

Constitutional talks - Final Conclusion of the UN Mission

Pursuing the second phase of the negotiations between the Sarawak Government and the Federal Government aka Malaya Government on the constitutional phase of the round-table regarding Sarawak rights, it was notably that the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report, “Final Conclusions of the Secretary-General,” on 14 September 1963 was missing.

It must be seriously considered by all representatives from all partners that the FINAL conclusion of the UN Mission is the last pieces of the puzzled which legitimized the formation of the Federation of Malaysia inaugurated on 16th September 1963. Therefore, the findings of the mission must be included in the constitutional talks of the second phase of the negotiation.

The UN Mission concluded that;

"...Bearing in mind the fundamental agreement of the three participating Governments in the Manila meetings, and the statement by the Republic of Indonesia and the Republic of the Philippine that they would welcome the formation of Malaysia provided that the support of the people of the territories was ascertained by me and that, in my opinion, complete compliance with the principal of self-determination within the requirements of General Assembly resolution 1541 (XV), Principal IX of the Annex, was ensured, my conclusion, based on the findings of the Mission, is that on both of these counts there is no doubt about the wishes of a sizeable majority of the peoples of these territories to join in the Federation of Malaysia.

Thus, the compliance mechanism involving the framework of the Federation of Malaysia based on the UN Resolution 1541 must be addressed seriously. The framework entailed that the Federation of Malaysia is an International Trusteeship System where the British as the Trustee of the Borneo States (Sarawak and Sabah) transferred their trusteeship obligation to the Federation of Malaysia through Malaysia Act 1963 Chapter 35 to became a new Trustee of the Trust Territories of Sarawak and Sabah. The obligation arise thence must be pursue by the Sarawak Government, Sabah Government and the Federal Government acting on behalf of the Malaya/Malaysia Federation.

Here, i would like the representatives of the negotiations to considered in their meetings such documents;

1. United Nation Resolution 1541.  "Principles which should guide members in determining whether or not an obligation exists to transmit the information called for under Article 73e of the Charter"

2. Malaysia Act 1963 Chapter 35

3. United Nations Resolution 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations

4. United Nation Resolution 2200A (XXI). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

5. United Nation Resolution 2200A (XXI). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

God-Speed

cmf_shalom

Sepatutnya semua akta yang dipaksa dilaksanakan menggunakan perintah darurat-setelah darurat itu berakhir...maka SEPATUTNYA  terbakal.

Tapi sampai ke titisan terakhir Petronas merasanya minyak wilayah Sarawak itu mereka punya. Sama juga TUN.

Dah la PDA 1974 menumpang perintah darurat, 13 Mei (Malaya yang berbunuh, laut Sabah, Sarawak yang terkorban)...bila perintah darurat itu di tarik balik p;ada 2012...Petronas terus merasakan diri mereka minyak itu mereka yang punya.


Lagi tidak boleh hadam..kenapa sampai sekarang Persekutuan sukar hendak memasukkan MA63 ke dalam Perlembagaan negara...Mungkin Malaya ingin terus bertopengkan Malaysia untuk menjajah Sabah, sarawak sehingga mereka diheret ke dlm Perjanjian 1957...mungkin ayat aku ni over, tapi melihat sikap Kerajaan Malaya selama ni, sikap mereka terhadap Sabah, Sarawak..itu la yang ayat yang terbaik.

Tak perlu belajar undang-undang pun, untuk nak paham apa yang dilakukan oleh Kerajaan Malaya dulu dan sekarang, sangat menganiayai penduduk Sabah, Sarawak...mengheret Sabah/Sarawak dan dipaksa ke dalam Perjanjian 1957 yang mereka tidak pernah hadir....sedangkan perdana menteri malaya la yang merayu Sabah, Sarawak membentuk Malaysia melalui Perjanjian 1963.

Dah macam cerita Israel-Palestine..
Dalam kes Malaysia..siapakah Israel, siapakah Palestine




Ini baru nilai yang dihitung mulai tahun 2012-2014 sahaja..bayangkan if dihitung sejak 1974! aku tidak pasti betul ke x perkiraan tu...

Yup aku setuju seperti kata seorang forumeer kt atas tu, tanpa masuk Malaysia, penduduk Sarawak tinggal dekat kubur...tapi sudah pasti kubur tu  berdindingkan kubur  emas dan belian dan ada aircond lagi...

cmf_shalom

Tunku Abdul Rahman memorandum to the British on the establishment of the Federation of Malaysia

46 PREM 11/3418
26 June 1961

[The Grand Design]: letter from Tunku Abdul Rahman to Mr Macmillan.

Enclosure: ‘Integration of British North Borneo territories and Singapore with the Federation of Malaya’

I was gratified to read your encouraging statement in Parliament last week about the proposed association of the Borneo territories, Singapore and the Federation of Malaya. As you may already be aware, I have written to Mr. Sandys regarding this, in particular about the future relationship of Brunei and the Federation. I am now forwarding a memorandum giving in some details our further thoughts on the subject, which I hope may serve as a basis for discussions.

Introduction
It is generally agreed that all dependent territories should in due course attain Sovereign and Independent status, an objective over which the United Kingdom and the Federation Government have no differences. Indeed, the Federation Government has followed the policies pursued in various parts of the world by the United Kingdom Government in this regard with appreciation and sympathy, being aware of the delicate balance required between progressive policies and the realities of particular situations. The immediate areas of concern to the Federation Government is Singapore, and further away, however, are the neighbouring territories, namely North Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak. The future must inevitably require careful, long term and in the present political climate, urgent consideration.

2. Annexes A and B show a breakdown of the area and population of each of these territories, and a map of this region.

3. The history of the Federation of Malaya is interrelated with the history of the Sultanate of Brunei which was formerly a powerful state with authority over those other two Borneo territories and territories of the Malay archipelago. There had been trade and political, social and cultural ties between those territories and Malaya from time immemorial. Racially the various indigenous peoples of those territories are related to the Malays, in fact they come of the same stock. The British domination in various degrees in this region during recent history brought about a closer political and administrative connection between the British North Borneo territories and British Malaya. There was established a currency union which still exists in the form of a Currency Agreement and there was interchangeability of the civil, police, educational and technical services, and in the case of the State of Brunei, many Malayan Civil Service, Medical Service and Technical Service officers are serving on secondment with the Brunei Government.

Proposal
4. Under the Defence Treaty with the United Kingdom, Malaya is committed for the defence of the Borneo territories, Singapore and Hong Kong in the event of external aggression or outbreak of hostilities in these territories. With regard to Singapore the Federation of Malaya is represented in the Internal Security Council.

It would not be out of place therefore if these territories were brought into closer ties with the Federation of Malaya. It is proposed therefore as a first step that the territories of Brunei, Borneo and Sarawak be brought into the Federation as units of the Federation, enjoying the same rights and privileges as the States which presently form the Federation of Malaya, namely, Johore, Malacca, Negri Sembilan, Selangor, Pahang, Perak, Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah, Perlis and Penang. Brunei, being a Sultanate, would have a Sultan as Head of State, the other two territories would be headed by Governors as is done with Penang and Malacca. It would be better of course if Sarawak could be returned to Brunei, at least the northern part of Sarawak, where the population is mainly Malays and Dyaks.

5. After the merger of these territories with the Federation of Malaya, the next logical step would be to form a greater federation with Singapore. As the present Constitution of Singapore requires to be reviewed in 1963, the most appropriate time for preliminary discussions with Singapore would be before that date. It would be difficult at this stage, to determine the position of Singapore in its relation with the Federation, but it is obvious that once they become part of the greater federation, Singapore would be subject to the influence of the Federation, with rights to determine fully its internal affairs, except with regard to matters of national importance, such as internal security, defence, development finance, immigration, education and internal defence, and so it follows with regard to foreign affairs the Greater Federation Government will assume sole responsibility.

6. The next matter which will require attention will be the question of British bases in Singapore which are now used as part of SEATO defence. But after the merger of Singapore with the Federation it is obvious that these bases would no longer be at the disposal of SEATO but could be maintained as bases for the defence of the Commonwealth.

7. The administration of Singapore, Brunei and the Federation presents no difficulties whatsoever because the system of civil administration in these territories follows the same pattern based on British administration. It only remains to maintain the present administrative system, and in the future the officers of these territories would be interchangeable or transferable as they belong to the same service. It is proposed however that Singapore should maintain their own civil service but with rights to claim for secondment of officers from the Federation.

8. It is proposed that a discussion on this line mentioned above should be held when the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom visits the Federation in September, after which a formal discussion can be arranged with representatives of the Federation Government on one side and the United Kingdom as representing the United Kingdom Government and these other territories on the other side.

9. There are no Constitutional problems however novel or difficult which cannot be resolved. The main problem will be how to present the plan for Greater Malaysia to the peoples of three respective territories. Singapore can express their own will through their elected representatives, but in view of the political immaturity of the people of Borneo it is not anticipated that they will have politicians who can represent them. It is to be expected therefore that the representation of the United Kingdom Government will include representatives from each of these territories as well. This meeting should decide on the appointment of an independent Commission with terms of reference to work out the Constitutional details of such a federation of territories. It is suggested that this Commission should, if possible, be made up of those members of the Commission who drafted the Constitution of the Federation of Malaya, with the exception of the Chairman, Lord Reid, who it is understood is indisposed. In his place it is proposed that Lord Ogmore who is conversant with affairs in this part of the world should be invited to serve as Chairman.

10. It is a matter for emphasis that such a federation, comprising a grand total of nearly ten million people, in an area of 130,000 square miles, as against a Federation of 50,000 square miles, will have the effect of creating a greater importance in the hearts and minds of the people of these territories and a national pride which would go a long way in building up a feeling of loyalty to the country. The federation of a Greater Malaysia or a Greater Malaya, whichever name may be decided upon, will be powerful and viable and will be able to give greater contribution in the support of the Commonwealth association.

11. It has been suggested in some quarters that the merger of these territories is a matter for a long term objective and should be considered as such. The Federation Government however does not share this view. It is felt that the time is opportune to give immediate consideration to a plan for an early integration of these territories with the Federation of Malaya. A delay will only result in many undesirable consequences. For example, the Federation is one of the participating Governments to the present Currency Agreement. The other four participating Governments are those whose territories are the subject of this proposal. It will be appreciated that this participation in an Agreement which requires unanimity on all major issues derogates materially from the Federation’s sovereignty as an independent nation in currency and financial matters. It is therefore natural that continued participation in such an Agreement under such conditions would be unsatisfactory from a long term point of view. The Federation Government is already being subjected to constant criticism by political opponents and the matter has become a live issue in recent election campaigns. In fact the Federation Government is actively considering withdrawing from this Agreement in accordance with the agreed procedure specified therein. At the same time it is felt that it would be a pity to break up an Agreement which has served all concerned so well in the past, but this Government would have no alternative, unless there is a reasonable prospect that all the territories covered by this Agreement will, in the near future, form an integral part of the Federation.

12. It is hoped that the British Government would give favourable consideration to this proposal for a Greater Malaysia. While relationship between the Federation of Malaya and the United Kingdom has been most cordial and the ties of friendship and common interest are inseparable, such a federation of territories as proposed will do much to arrest the spread of Communism in this region of Asia, and this is particularly urgent in view of the recent intensive Communist activities in South East Asia as a result of their success in Laos.











Tapi bila memberi tawaran kepada Sabah Sarawak;

cmf_shalom

cmf_shalom replied at 20-6-2019 05:10 PM
Tunku Abdul Rahman memorandum to the British on the establishment of the Federation of Malaysia

4 ...

Ini la cara tunku melihat orang sabah sarawak...tidak mustahil cara ini diperturunkan kepada orang malaya...

Selain mendakwa  penduduk Borneo tidak matang....tunku tanpa segan silu mengesyorkan kepada British agar sebahagian sarawak dijajah semula oleh Brunei. Sedangkan Brunei sendiri sudah menerima bahawa Sarawak adalah sebuah wilayah bukan dibawah Brunei. Pada zaman dulu, penguasahan Brunei di Sarawak bukan merujuk kepada Sarawak Sekarang...cuma area Santubong sampai ke Bau sahaja, wilayah Brunei ke atas Sarawak.

Sikap tunku dan cara dia melihat sabah sarawK adalah jawapan terbaik yang menjelaskan situasi yg berlaku kt malaysia sekarang

cmf_shalom

cmf_shalom replied at 20-6-2019 05:10 PM
Tunku Abdul Rahman memorandum to the British on the establishment of the Federation of Malaysia

4 ...

Walaupun cara tunku melihat Brunei dengan 2 belah mata... Berbanding cara tunku melihat sabah sarawak dengan pejam mata... Tapi masih terdetik di hati tunku utk Brunei menyerahkan kedaulatanya kepada malaya


Mungkin tunku lupa penghujung tahun 1959..kerajaan Brunei telah memberi pinjaman kewangan kepada Persekutuan Malaya..yg terdesak mmerlukan duit ketika itu .

Kerana itu la, menurut laporan Geofray Tory dalam laporannya pada 19 Julai 1960 menyebut" The sultan no very keen on the integration..because of his fear that Malaya would used Brunei as milch cown."
(43 DO 169/25. no. 63)

cmf_shalom

cmf_shalom

My country -yes
Your country-Yes
Our country -No!until Malaya change 1957  Federal Constitution to 1963 as per Malaysia Agreement!

cmf_shalom

Ini sebelum Malaysia dibentuk:

cmf_shalom

Kalau sir Cobbold tidak membuat magic ke atas laporannya, dari reaksi rakyat Sarawak ketika itu, kita dah tau majoriti rakyat Sarawak nak mana satu..

sama ada kami tinggal di kubur sebab tidak masuk malaysia
sama ada kami dijajah oleh Indonesia sebab  tidak masuk malaysia
atau apa sahaja...itu semua andaian..

saya pun if nak buat boleh pelbagai andaian..tapi andaian ni..majoritinya kerja org yang tidak dapat menerima kenyataan..

Kita bukannya dalam modul spekulatif falsafah etc..

cmf_shalom

cmf_shalom

Ini yang berlaku ke atas Sabah, Sarawak bila Malaysia telah dibentuk