CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: Sang_Pencinta

'Leon Tak Seiras, Tak Buktikan Anak Sultan' - Ini Jawapan 'Sumber Istana' Kepada

  [Copy link]
Post time 8-11-2019 01:48 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
so what, kalo abe taknak baby leon.. sape bole paksa dia? nak cemarkan imej islam sbb tknak anak sendiri? baper ramai da laki islam pangai cam abe... tingai anak cerai bini...

so no isu kalo abe tknak baby leon...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 8-11-2019 03:09 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
sarah82 replied at 7-11-2019 07:32 AM
Aku baca kat thread tu.. Mmg yg problem tu abe exgong.. Sila masuk thread berpagar tu.. X salah ad ...

perlu i baca 5 txo 6 thread .....mengarut
ipercaya jah oksana memang refused dna test sewaktu pregnancy  .... if sudah buat i percaya lawyer sultan akan cakap lain .... sebab procedure ....boleh buat anak cacat atau gugur

beliau ada masalah impotent yea ... mungkin tidak berhasil dengan bini sebelum bukan ber makna oksana tidak boleh mengandung ....
...
rugi sudah dapat anak lelaki mahu buang pula ....jarang jumpa jantan jenis tidak berguna begini atau ego tercalar
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 03:11 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
aint replied at 7-11-2019 09:48 AM
so what, kalo abe taknak baby leon.. sape bole paksa dia? nak cemarkan imej islam sbb tknak anak sen ...

bagus lah sama kan ketua agama dengan marhein ...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 03:14 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
cmf_jeangrey replied at 7-11-2019 09:47 AM
Melayu totok orthodox mmg gitu..yg paling ramai menghina janda, mandul, anak dara tua tu kaum yg s ...

kali ini back up mereka lebih sedikit ...kata nya team malaysia ...celah kenkang mana lah sultan wakili malaysia dalam hal ehwal rumah tangga
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 07:44 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
nolya replied at 8-11-2019 01:43 AM
Entah2 pinjam baby orang lain ambek gambar. Baby Dia, Dia sorok. Mana tau.

Oh my. ........

Jahat sangat ke perempuan ni?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 07:59 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
ada iras bapak ke..
xde iras mak ke..
semua ni xkan terjawab tanpa DNA test..
buat aje la dna test tu
x payah sembang beriye sgt
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 8-11-2019 08:50 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Dwdrum replied at 8-11-2019 03:09 AM
perlu i baca 5 txo 6 thread .....mengarut
ipercaya jah oksana memang refused dna test sewak ...

Kita tgk la mcm mana.. Mcm aku komen.. Kalau oks nak hak anak dia.. Dia kena dtg dan bawa kes ke mahkamah khas..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 09:04 AM | Show all posts
Edited by borrow at 8-11-2019 12:36 PM

1. Oks preggy bulan Aug . Kat sini link SK pun ckp , keutamaan adalah anak. Dh preggy mesti excited , bagitau sk. If sk mandul , awal2 kena tendang.

if sheols tau sk ada prob kesuburan , since sheols ular katanya , lebih lojik sheols gugurkan kandungan. Pastu try preggy masa wat fertility di German.

2. Wedding circus ujung Nov. Time ni Oks preggy 3-4 bulan. Katakan sheols tak pnh bagitau preggy , nanti after wat fertility baru nak ckp. Tak lojik juga. Dh preggy 4 bulan tp mengaku 2 minggu? After 4 bulan , perut dh nmpk mcm 7 bulan.

3. Di german, prenatal dna test diharamkan kan. So tak lojik ada test kat sana. Ibu2 yg tak curang pun vlum tentu mau buat , inikan pulak if curang. Ada forumer ckp , kawan sheols (kerabat) kata Oks refused dna test.

Ai still ada keraguan stori fertility german tu. DNA test vley rungkai misteri.Tp if sk pun wat dunno, wat to du

Ekceli Leon ada family atok nenek pacit , n berduit. Life tak seteruk baby lain. Hidup dlm berteka teki , mebi psikologi akan terganggu. Hope tak efek sgtlah , hidup hepi2.





Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 8-11-2019 09:08 AM | Show all posts
zalimnya ..tak ngaku anak..anak kecil comel tu tak berdosa.....



comelnya ank tu ....buat dna..takyah pusing2 lagi..klu anak kau kau ambiklah bela... kat bini yg bukan muslim tu  entah apa jadi nanti ... kalau bukan anak ..dah tak yah nak bising
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 09:10 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Entahnya. Buat apa bagi banyak alasan, buat sajalah ujian dna.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 09:23 AM | Show all posts
HannahMontana replied at 7-11-2019 10:02 PM
Awal-awak ni xde siapa percaya ,semuanya anggap itu gurauan ,nanti nanti bila dah terselak semuany ...

tang nenda leon ni mek mmg tau evilnya
kesian leon
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 10:51 AM | Show all posts
Dwdrum replied at 7-11-2019 05:00 PM
big pharma boleh buat apa dengan DNA sultan? ....
kan beliau minta DNA ikut procedure ...sama a ...

You tak tau ke DNA sultan of one of the poorest state in Malaysia, highest HIV numbers ini amat berharga siapa dapat DNA ni boleh kaya ada tulah sultan
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 11:08 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
nolya replied at 8-11-2019 01:43 AM
Entah2 pinjam baby orang lain ambek gambar. Baby Dia, Dia sorok. Mana tau.

Boleh jd jugekkkk kann
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 11:27 AM | Show all posts
Edited by nirman at 8-11-2019 11:31 AM

Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v. Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (1996) 1 MLJ 617 was the first and is as of 2007 the only case to have been heard by the Special Court of Malaysia which hears cases brought against the Malay rulers (the sultans who serve as constitutional monarchs of seven of the Malay states).

The plaintiff was a Singaporean businesswoman and the defendant was the Sultan of Pahang. Faridah alleged that the Sultan had committed libel against her, and sued for damages. The Attorney General consented to the case, permitting the Special Court to hear it. However, whether the alleged libel had in fact occurred was never decided, as the Special Court ruled 4-1 that non-Malaysians could not bring a suit against the Malay rulers.

Please read the above, tak faham English guna google translate. A non malaysian cannot sue the Malay rulers in malaysia. so of course Oks kena start in Russia, ada faham.

tambah lagi:

In 1993, the Constitution of Malaysia was amended, with a new Part XV being added. This Part XV provided for the constitution of a Special Court to try the Malay rulers for any crime, as well as any civil cases brought against them; previously, the rulers had been above the law. The Special Court would comprise the Chief Justice, the Chief Judge of Malaya, the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, and two judges, present or past, from either the Federal Court or a High Court, nominated by the Conference of Rulers.[1]
Faridah Begum was the first case heard by the Special Court, and remains the only case it has ever heard as of 2007.

Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 8-11-2019 11:33 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
nirman replied at 8-11-2019 11:27 AM
Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v. Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (1996) 1 MLJ 617 was the first and is as of 200 ...


Good info. Patutlah Oks failkan kes di Russia sana. Susah rupanya orang kebanyakan saman Sultan di negara kita
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 11:33 AM | Show all posts
Perangai bapak memalukan malaysia..
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 8-11-2019 11:38 AM | Show all posts
sarah82 replied at 7-11-2019 10:06 PM
Boleh.. Sultan ada mahkamah khas.. Ikut undang tubuh kerajaan Kelantan.. Mana2 anak lelaki sultan  ...

In 1998, then Tengku Idris (later Sultan Sharafuddin) of Selangor sued a company, Dikim Holdings in the High Court. In 1999, when his father, Sultan Salahuddin was elected as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (Paramount Ruler) of Malaysia, Tengku Idris was appointed as Regent of Selangor. The case was referred to the Federal Court on whether the Regent is considered a ruler, which the court replied in the negative. In 2001, Sultan Salahuddin died and Tengku Idris ascended the Selangor throne. The case was referred to the Federal Court again, which the court ruled that the High Court had lost jurisdiction over the case, and the case must be withdrawn and refiled in the Special Court. In both cases, only the Special Court had authority to exercise jurisdiction over the rulers, whether they were to be tried or intended to try another party.[44]
The Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Ja'afar became the first ruler to have judgement made against him in the Special Court, whereby he was ordered to settle US$1 million in debts he had owed to a bank.[45] The landmark verdict prompted his oldest son, the Regent of Negeri Sembilan, Tunku Naquiyuddin to advocate the restoration of rulers' immunity during a speech in November 2008. This raised concerns among the public, in view of the history of past royal excesses, but specifically the Gomez incident. Tunku Naquiyuddin, however, added further that immunity to rulers should not be extended to cases when rulers commit acts of criminality, such as assault.[46]


baca fakta atas ya,

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 12:03 PM | Show all posts
Semoga di tunjuk kan kebenaran nanti.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 12:09 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
HannahMontana replied at 7-11-2019 09:53 PM
Sebab tu Tuhan pun buat hati kering dgn mereka , sepanjang zaman bom meletup bersepai kehidupan me ...

Kannnn hannahh....hehe he

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2019 12:17 PM | Show all posts
kesian pulak aku dgn baby leon tu...
buat DNA test la....

apa ke payah benar...
takkan takut  DNA test tu memihak kepada baby leon....?

Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CARI Infonet

5-5-2024 07:44 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.335947 second(s), 42 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list