|
View: 6884|Reply: 53
|
[Politik]
UPDATE Post #1- ANALOGI | Pencerahan terhadap putar belit dan miskonsepsi isu pe
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Edited by kemaruk at 26-5-2020 02:14 PM
Baru hari ni bangkem cuti jadi boleh la tulis panjang-panjang sikit..
1) Senang ye orang kaya curi juta2, digugurkan dakwaan lepas pulangkkan duit.
JAWABAN :
Riza tidak didakwa atas kesalahan mencuri, tapi didakwa bawah akta AMLA. Bawah akta ini, jika tertuduh boleh buktikan yang dia tidak tahu sumber wang yang diperolehi tu dari sumber haram, maka tertuduh boleh dibebaskan jika pulangkan sejumlah wang seperti yang dipersetujui. Contoh:
“Mereka yang secara sukarela menyerahkan semula wang yang diterima dari dana 1MDB tidak akan didakwa selepas ini,” katanya.
https://malaysiagazette.com/2019/06/21/kes-1mdb-jakel-habib-jewels-naza-quest-auto-disaman-sprm/
2) Eh riza aziz ni dah dibuktikan tidak bersalah oleh mahkamah ke?
JAWABAN : Perbicaraan belum dimulakan lagi. Tapi oleh kerana peguambela Riza berjaya membuktikan Riza tidak tahu menahu punca duit pelaburan itu dari sumber yang meragukan melalui surat representasi, maka pihak pendakwaraya setuju menggugurkan kes. Surat representasi tu ada tulis tentang Riza tidak tahu duit yang diterima itu duit yang haram dan Riza bersetuju untuk pulangkan sebahagian wang yang diterimanya
The statement (on the agreement) was read out in open court by deputy public prosecutor Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram.
In the statement, Sri Ram said the accused had made several representations and after the representations have been considered carefully, several decisions have been reached.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2020/05/592458/riza-aziz-gets-dnaa-money-laundering-charges
3) Kenapa pihak pendakwaraya tak teruskan perbicaraan je?
JAWABAN : Pihak pendakwaraya tahu cuma sia-sia kalau diteruskan pendakwaan sebab mereka tak ada bukti yang kukuh untuk menjatuhkan kesalahan terhadap Riza
4) Jangan tipu la.. ni mesti AG baru si Idrus Harun tu yang gugurkan kes
JAWABAN : Pihak pendakwaraya kes Riza ini diketuai oleh Gopal Sri Ram (GSR), iaitu orang yang dilantik oleh Tommy Thomas sendiri. GSR dan pasukannya telah bagi taklimat dan bagi nasihat kepada AG untuk gugurkan kes ini. GSR juga kata Tommy Thomas juga setuju dengan pengguguran ini
"Perkara ini telah dibentangkan kepada saya setelah saya dimaklumkan tentang pendirian terdahulu Tan Sri Thomas.
"Setelah ditaklimatkan oleh timbalan-timbalan pendakwa raya yang mengendalikan perkara ini, saya bersependapat dengan pandangan mantan peguam negara sebagaimana yang telah ditaklimatkan kepada saya, dan telah bersetuju untuk menerima tawaran Riza tertakluk kepada pematuhan yang ketat terhadap semua terma dan syarat," katanya.
https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/526037
5) Eh si Idrus Harun tu yang jadi AG sekarang.. patut dia teruskan aja kes ni
JAWABAN : Sedangkan pasukan pendakwaraya yang kununnya hebat untuk membuktikan Riza bersalah diketuai GSR pon mengaku kalah dan tak dapat cari bukti yang kukuh, kenapa AG nak teruskan pulak? Adakah GSR tak reti buat kerja? Jika AG teruskan jugak menyiasat kes ni tanpa dibantu oleh GSR, adakah korang macai2 PH akan terima keputusan AG sekiranya AG membuktikan Riza tidak bersalah kelak?
6) Budak tadika mana kata "advised" tu "nasihat"? Ko ni mabuk todi hearsay pon tak tau apa maksud
JAWABAN : Bila leluhur dah kantoi, dia akan spin dan putar-putar.. macam tak biasa lah kann.. dah tersemat di dalam DNA yang mengkelilingi hidupmu..
@sam1528 @Maideen. @ResellerMaxis
UPDATE!!!!
Analoginya bukannya kantoi curi ayam 10 ekor, pastu pulangkan 2 ekor langsung dibebaskan oleh polis.. bukan..
analogi sebenar lebih kurang camni lah:
1) ko bercadang nak buat bisnes ternak ayam telur
2) member baik ko si ahmeng cakap nak bantu ko, dia nak labur rm1 juta
3) bisnes ko maju dan untung berjuta-juta
4) ko dapat tau rupanya si ahmmeng tu tokan dadah.. polis tengah buru dia
5) wang yang ahmeng laburkan dekat ko RM1 juta tu sebenarnya dari hasil jualan dadah
6) polis soal siasat ko.. ko kata ko tak tahu duit tu duit haram
7) ko bagi bukti yang ko tak terlibat jual dadah, dan tak tahu asal usul duit tu.. yang ko tau, si ahmeng ni kaya sebab bisnes pembalakan
8) ko janji kat polis ko akan pulangkan Rm1 juta tu kat polis dengan syarat ko dibebaskan
9) selepas polis buat siasatan, polis setuju terima tawaran ko sebab polis takde bukti yang kukuh untuk menuduh ko bersubahat dengan ahmeng jual dadah
|
Rate
-
2
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
esok raya bemat... eh.. bangkem.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tq bangkem atas pencerahan . Dengan bahasa simple Dan senang faham |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
koda x comolot ngn maideen ke keruk?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ayat penerangan konsep QnA guna bahasa layman gini la bagus
senang semua orang nak faham
good job bangkem
geng Mohan dah mula krik krikk dah sekarang ni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kes Najib aritu under AMLA tak?
Ada harapan dia dibebaskan ni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 23-5-2020 04:00 PM
LOOOL ... aku kesian kat ko
Ye lah , apakebenda 'hearsay' pon tak tau
'hearsay' <> tipu taaaau
Laaaa , ingat ko dah lari tak mau balik dah
Ko lari ambil semangat yeee
Ye lah , ko kan mamat atheist (oooppppssss , sekarang mengaku agnostic) dok perjuangkan melayu islam
Boleh percaya ke ni?
@kemaruk
Ni lagi sekali dari Tommy Thomas , kalo ko tak paham english , pergi carik cikgu sekolah rendah ko tu :
I was satisfied that the prosecution had a very strong case to establish the ingredients of the offences. The documentary trail was substantial and highly credible. Upon conviction, the prosecution would have invited the trial judge to impose a sentence commensurate with the severity of the offences, the maximum being 15 years for each charge. But more significantly, the criminal court is given power by Parliament to additionally impose a penalty up to 5 times the amount involved in the unlawful activities, that is 5 times USD248 million, which would work out to some USD1.2 billion. We would have sought this sum upon his conviction.
That same rigour was brought to the decision to prosecute Riza. In none of these 25 odd cases, did I consider favourably a request by any accused to settle on such terribly poor terms to the prosecution. That would have called into question the wisdom and integrity of my decision to prosecute in the first place.
The purpose of prosecuting Riza was not to strengthen our chances of securing monies from DOJ. DOJ would have returned these monies in any event because it belongs to Malaysia and was stolen from Malaysia. Riza is not offering to pay any new money or monies from any source other than DOJ seized assets. The USD108 million, would in any event be returned by DOJ to Malaysia. Thus, Riza is unnecessarily getting credit for returning monies that are not his
In both civil and criminal proceedings which proceed to trial, a plaintiff or the prosecution loses substantial leverage over the adverse party if it withdraws court proceeding before the terms of settlement are completely performed. This is elementary. Hence, one needs to question why Riza has been given a DNAA so prematurely.
Ha ha ha h a ... ko paham tak apa yang dicatat oleh Tommy Thomas?
Kat mana yg dicatat Tommy Thomas setuju nak setel kes ni?
Kah kah kah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@Maideen. sini la ko kn loyer..jngn buat malu LLB yg ko ade tu..advocate and solicitor kn...call to the bar semer...
prffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffght |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAPig dan Pakatan Hancing menjadikan kencing itu minuman suci bagi mereka.
Hancing adalah wangian kasturi bagi mereka.
Satu2 kencing dan khianat mereka terdedah.
Itu belum kes bro Tommy dah terlupa dakwaan rasuah LGE digugurkan secara tiba2..
khennn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hang dok caklap pasal diri sendir ke?
Konar , jangan tak konar ... konar baring sampai cecah telinga
Kan kan kan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yan konar tu ngko
sampai sekarang tak jawab soalan mudah ni
1) AG tipu kengkunun GSR ada sebut TT pon setuju gugur kes
2) Atau GSR tipu kengkunun TT pon setuju gugur kes
ko putar belit pulak
biarlah.. selagi ko tak jawab, selagi tu bangkem tak layan
kelingling la ko dengan DNA leluhur ko yang penuh dengan kegelapan tu
melayu kalau dah silap, dorang takkan putar belit
tapi kalau ada darah yang satu tu.. hhhhmmmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha ha .... berpusing pusing ko dok kejar ekor sendiri
AG tipu lah , Gopal Sr Ram tipu lah
Yang amat ketara , ko tak tau apakebenda tu 'hearsay'
Budak sekolah rendah pon tau
Tu adalah kelemahan ko , kureng fasih english
Ada muka pulak tu nak bertekak
Ye lah , atheist (ooooppppsss sekarang mengaku agnistic pulak) ... yang kononnya perjuangkan melayu islam
Pssssttt ... 'hearsay' <> tipu taaaauu
Kih kih kih
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i've never said that "hearsay" has the same meaning as "tipu"
tuan2 dan puan2, this is just a classic of "ad hominem" fallacy
attacking unrelavent issue instead of the real issue itself
please be ashamed of yourself..
i can carry on communicating with you in english if you really want to know how good i am in english
yes maybe my english is not perfect, but atleast better than what you keling2 kat sini
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@Maideen. ko msok ajar derang ni apa itu hearsay..ko quote skali seksyen2 dlm akta keterangan 1950.. ajar skali res gestae tu mende kt dak2 ni...jngn wat malu pemegang2 LLB dlm forum ni deen
prffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffght |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 23-5-2020 07:16 PM
LOOOL ... bila dah kena setepek tang dahi , mengundur pulak
Mati2 sekarang ko nak cover line :
i've never said that "hearsay" has the same meaning as "tipu"
Yg aku dok kata 'hearsay' ko dok balas yg AG tipu lah , Gopal Sri Ram tipu lah
Tak ke pahaman ko : 'hearsay' = tipu ????
Kalo tak awal2 lagi ko akan nafikan ... ni dah berpuluh posts ... baru nak nafi pasal ko dah tersepit
No problems if you want to communicate in english
I repeat ; to your understanding : 'hearsay' = tipu
This is substandard comprehension
'hearsay' is relevant & central to this whole issue
Show me where Tommy Thomas explicitly stated that he agreed to this 'plea bargain'
You would be hard pressed
This is what happen when an atheist (oooppppsss ... its agnostic now) who unashamedly wants to champion the malay islam issue
fallacy of 'ad hominem' issit ... you don't know what you are talking about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i've never agreed AG decided to drop the case because of hearsay
you were the one who said that
AG and GSR had a briefing before the decision is made
everytime i asked you which statement is "hearsay" and from whom, you cuma keling2 je
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kah kah kah ... you can't help being an idiot yeah
No one is saying that the AG dropped the case because of 'hearsay'
This again shows that you don't understand what is 'hearsay'
To your substandard comprehension : 'hearsay' = tipu
At your age , you are expected to know what it is (its certainly not tipu)
Nobody is going to spoonfeed you ...
So what if the AG had a briefing session?
Second time asking : Show me where Tommy Thomas explicitly stated that he agreed to this so called 'plea bargain'?
You are not able to do so & you are at a loss
This can only mean 2 things , either you
(a) do not understand what is 'hearsay'
or
(b) you are a liar which is actually your second nature
or
(c) both (a) & (b)
He he he he
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ape kejadah dok ulang hearsay2 nih. Hearsay tu x semestinya betul, x semestinya salah. Bknnye tipu. Kebodohan DAPig mmg x terjangkau dek akal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elated replied at 23-5-2020 02:54 PM
Tq bangkem atas pencerahan . Dengan bahasa simple Dan senang faham
Tapi guna bhs simple mcm mane pun kalu dah nama nya pencacai ph tetap tak mau faham.siap spin mcm mabok toddi lagi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 23-5-2020 01:34 PM
变色卡
Author
