|
|
[Dunia]
Lilibet Diana Nama Diberi ~ Onyang Terkedu Di Atas Takhte
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Tinot7 replied at 7-6-2021 12:20 PM
Titles dah kena strip ka? Deme tak kena panggil by titles pon?
Aikkkk... Si archie ni rupa 100% kokesen.. dah baiki dna ke apa si mekgan ni? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
melinda_kerr replied at 7-6-2021 09:04 AM
Physco couple ni... sesuaila tu berdua. Kalau xde harta royal agaknya dah mereput tepi jalan..
Kalau tak de harta yg diwarisi dan title, tak mungkin bini dia nak kawin dgn dia (PH)! PH ala2 rebellious dan kita lihat adegan seterusnya...! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
getarsukma replied at 7-6-2021 01:18 PM
Aikkkk... Si archie ni rupa 100% kokesen.. dah baiki dna ke apa si mekgan ni?
Archie ni dulu kecoh diorg pakai surrogate mother kan?itu sbb kurang sikit rupa meghan kot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thunderclouds replied at 7-6-2021 12:59 PM
Xstrip pon. Depa masih part of BRF, harry pn masih kekal in line for the throne blakang ank2 sedar ...
Agak pelik la kalau sembang santai family buat kat medsos.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1437680/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-wont-lose-duke-duchess-of-sussex-titles-evg/amp
Prince Harry and Meghan: Expert explains why Sussexes WON'T lose titles
PRINCE HARRY and Meghan Markle have faced growing calls from critics to be stripped of their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles now they are no longer working royals. But, a constitutional expert has explained why it is highly unlikely to happen.
ByFREDERICA MILLER
PUBLISHED: 15:23, Tue, Jun 1, 2021UPDATED:15:24, Tue, Jun 1, 2021
Prince Harry, 36, andMeghan Markle, 39, left the Royal Family behind in order to pursue "a more peaceful life" as private citizens in the USA. Since stepping down as senior royals in March 2020, the couple have gained financial independence from the Firm and taken part in several controversial ventures, including their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which they made a series of damning allegations about the Royal Family.
As non-senior royals, Meghan and Harry enjoy more freedom of expression than working members of the monarchy.
They have held onto their HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) styles and Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles despite no longer serving the Crown and some critics feel their new lifestyle is not in keeping with their royal status.
Nonetheless, Meghan and Harry are highly unlikely to lose the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles they received from the Queen as a wedding gift and a constitutional expert has told Express.co.uk why.
Why Meghan and Harry WON'T lose their royal titles
Meghan and Harry will not lose their royal titles because there is no recent precedent for the move, a constitutional expert has claimed.
Academic Iain MacMarthanne told Express.co.uk: "There is in some quarters a feeding frenzy at present for the removal of all or some of Prince Harry’s titles.
"However, before entertaining such an idea there are a few first-stage considerations to be embraced."
There is no modern precedent for such a move, Mr MacMarthanne explained.
The expert said: "Within the context of present circumstances, Prince Harry was born an HRH and prince, and there is no modern precedent for someone born as such being stripped of these styles and titles."
He added: "The Sussex peerage is a hereditary creation and was given as a gift by the Queen.
"Similarly, as with royal styles and titles, there is no modern precedent for the forfeiture of a royal peerage."
Highlighting some rare historical instances when royal titles have been taken away, Mr MacMarthanne said: "There are however historic exceptions where both have occurred and as such alternative precedents have been established, but these have been exceptional: where the individuals concerned were considered enemies of the state, such as in 1917, resulting in George V stripping German relations of their British royal titles and peerages through Letters Patent; and where a person of royal birth voluntarily relinquished their titles, again being given effect through Letters Patent, as in the case of HRH Princess Patricia of Connaught when she married."
The most likely way Harry and Meghan would lose their Sussex titles would be if they chose to relinquish them themselves, Mr MacMarthanne explained.
The expert added: "Presently, as far as the Sussex peerage is concerned there is now the possibility of the holder utilising the Peerage Act of 1963, and renouncing their titles for life, which any subsequent holder can also do.
"This in effect puts the peerage into abeyance until such times as a legitimate heir claims it."
In regards to the couple's HRH styles, Harry could choose to petition the Queen to get them removed.
Mr MacMarthanne added: "In respect of royal styles and titles though, there is at present, no legislative means for an HRH and prince or princess to renounce them.
The academic explained: "It does however remain open for the individual, Prince Harry in this instance, to petition the Queen to issue Letters Patent to that effect."
As implausible as it may seem, the Queen does still have the option to remove Harry and Meghan's royal status if "deemed necessary."
Mr MacMarthanne added: "Ultimately though, as happened in 1917 by the hand of the Queen’s grandfather George V, all options remain open and with a precedent already set for the removal of royal styles, titles and peerages, when deemed necessary, this remains an established option."
Some have called for Harry to also lose his place as sixth in the line of succession but this would require an Act of Parliament.
Mr MacMarthanne added: "To remove Prince Harry and his heirs from the line of succession, as has also been suggested, would, however, require an Act of Parliament."
Asked what names Harry and Meghan would be known by if they did ditch their titles, Mr MacMarthanne said: "Were the Duke of Sussex to use the 1963 legislation and renounce his peerage he would automatically revert to being HRH Prince Henry of Wales, and when his father became King, HRH The Prince Henry."
Mr MacMarthanne was keen to emphasise that Meghan only holds her titles via her marriage to Harry.
He added: "If Prince Harry were to renounce his peerage his wife would cease to be the Duchess of Sussex and would instead become HRH Princess Henry of Wales and subsequently HRH The Princess Henry.
"It should be remembered that as far as his wife is concerned she enjoys his titles as a courtesy of their marriage, she does not hold them in her own right, and consequently she would not be formally known as Princess Meghan."
Kalau deme minta heri tinggalkan title, voley jahh..
dan Heri voley hilang jahh title melalui parlimen deme.. Cuma renyah kott nak buat akta cenggitu lagi, khas utk heri.
Titles Deprivation Act 1917
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_Deprivation_Act_1917
TheTitles Deprivation Act 1917is anAct of Parliamentof the United Kingdom which authorised enemies of the United Kingdom during theFirst World Warto be deprived of their Britishpeeragesand royal titles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
getarsukma replied at 7-6-2021 01:18 PM
Aikkkk... Si archie ni rupa 100% kokesen.. dah baiki dna ke apa si mekgan ni?
Acikmek tu bknnya 100% blek ponn..
Tapi mmg la, mmg kokesen abis kwaci..
Anak2 mikel jekson pon sumer takde rupe blek.. giteww.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmf_premierleag replied at 7-6-2021 12:10 PM
ramainya penjilat BRF ya
acik2 masih lagi rasa mereka ni semua bayangan tohan kaa?
At least la brf xde la kemaruk sungguh suruh sembah..insist deyols bayangan tohan semedang .nak stay relevant dok situ diam2 .tapi menghabehkan boreh tu tetap la ada. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why not Doria Oprah gayle? Tetap juga nak milked from royals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dua2 gila perhatian. Kerja tak nak.
Puihh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmf_premierleag replied at 7-6-2021 12:08 PM
tahniah @MeghanK
iols suke baby girl
hah, dah beranak baru ke..apasal perut iols tak kempis lagi ni 
btw, lily tu nama kucing iols  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dah knp Lilibet? Adehhh nk menganjing je hape... Kot Lily Beth ke...sedap la jgk... Ntah pape si megan ni...sajaa la tu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iol tak paham, dah dikutuk dicela macam-macam BRF ujung2 bagi anak nama sekutu itu juge. Tak ke lagi sakit mengenang penderitaan pedih jerih terluka abadi tu bila tulis nama anak? 
melainkan auta je penderitaan tu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tegelaku aku baca sis 
klu kt forum suka guna kiasan badan dh bau tanah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3chanceno replied at 7-6-2021 01:39 PM
Kalau tak de harta yg diwarisi dan title, tak mungkin bini dia nak kawin dgn dia (PH)! PH ala2 reb ...
Fikir Logik la kan.. apa je dua tu buat selain dr duit dr interview sana sini.. dapat elaun lagilah tu. Kalau tak xkanla dapat hidup mcm skrang. Nk hrpkan wife dah lama tkde job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmg nama timangan queen lilibet.katanya kecik2 dulu tk reti sebut elizabeth, dok sebut lilibet terus lekat nama tu. sampai family pun panggil lilibet.klu tengok history queen, surat2 dia pun sign as lilibet.
btw, iols pun menyampah meghan ni guna nama queen. sibuk jugak la dgn royalty blood tu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tinot7 replied at 7-6-2021 01:45 PM
Agak pelik la kalau sembang santai family buat kat medsos.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.exp ...
Lah. Exactly proving my point. Stripped of his title sekalipon, he still a prince regardless. Masih knaa pggil dia hrh. Hat media depa kt sana hingaq demand them royals to boot him out entirely frm the family. Lgsung xmasuk line to the throne, demand dia jd plain harry shj. No such thing. Parliament depa got much important things to do dr lyn public outcry sbb both of them dh xterima stipend dr gvmnt dh pon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
getarsukma replied at 7-6-2021 09:18 AM
Couple tersangkak tak sedar diri... Kalau ikut tak appropriate dan tak layak pun guna nama queen pad ...
Eh sama pulak cite mcm bini sepupu aku. Beria letak nama anak, nama arwah nenek kitorg konon nak memperingati arwah sbb tu boh nama anak sama dgn nenek. Bangga post kat fb psl ni. Padahal ko bukan kenal in person pun nenek kitorg tu. masa korg kawin, dah lama nenek meninggal. Yg sepupu tu pun bukan rapat sgt dgn nenek. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tipahketipung replied at 7-6-2021 02:09 PM
Dua2 gila perhatian. Kerja tak nak.
Puihh
Xkerja pon xpaa...harry tu busuk2 pn independently rich. Meghan tu pn seblom kawen mmg dh self made millionaire wpun pelakon drama je. Kalo nk compare ngn kate hat sat keja sat xkeja seblom kawen ngn william tu btiang2 jauh kene tggal ngn meghan ni ha. If they live frugal,they can survive. Nk live in style,kna keja lah. Simple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by delia3003 at 7-6-2021 03:30 PM
Tinot7 replied at 7-6-2021 01:13 PM
Pins of wales punya twitter masa ucapkan hepi besday kat lottie pakai title penuh. Sbb tu iols kat ...
Sbb diorang dah keluar BRF, tu yg lebih kpd guna nama biasa, mcm wish sesama family je. Lagipun anak2 hairy dgn mekgan takde title, anak diorang belum layak dpt title prince/princess. Hairy dgn mekgan reject title biasa utk archie. Nak buang title diorang bukan senang, libatkan parlimen semua, melainkan hairy sendiri nak renounce title dia tu. Tak rasa hairy nak buat mcm tu, title tu penting kot utk dia carik makan. Lagikan anak tak dapat title prince pun dia merempan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thunderclouds replied at 7-6-2021 07:28 AM
Xkerja pon xpaa...harry tu busuk2 pn independently rich. Meghan tu pn seblom kawen mmg dh self ma ...
Simple lah dok makan duit taxpayers dan duit mendiang mommy! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kata nak escape royal pains.. ni dh macam terhegeh2 penjilat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 7-6-2021 01:18 PM
Post time 7-6-2021 01:45 PM
