Mahathir vs Anwar - kes2 dah mula dibuka

sam1528

Baru bertemu buku & ruas ... lawan kasi habis



Sumber


Anwar files statement of defence, cites cronyism and family ties in Dr Mahathir's decisions  
By Rahmat Khairulrijal -             June 15, 2023 @ 2:57pm


KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has cited several decisions made by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to justify why the RM150 million defamation suit against him by the latter should be thrown out.

The prime minister listed examples of decisions made by Dr Mahathir during his 22-year tenure as prime minister for the first time from 1981 to 2003, and again from 2018 to 2020 which protected business personalities closely linked to him.

Anwar said Dr Mahathir had made decisions which encouraged the practice of cronyism in the country, especially during his first tenure as Prime Minister and Minister of Finance.

He said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Dr Mahathir had used his position to procure financial benefit and enrich his family members and cronies.

In his statement of defence against the law suit, Anwar said there are reasonable grounds to believe Dr Mahathir had directed for national wealth, assets and taxpayers' monies to be used for the purpose of benefitting the latter's family members and cronies.

He said Dr Mahathir had used the the Bumiputera agenda to enrich his own family members and cronies, which led to a negative impact and downturn on the nation's economy and finances.

Anwar referred to the bailing out of Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd (KPB) owned by Dr Mahathir's son Mirzan by Petronas and Malaysia International Shipping Corporation (MISC) in 1997, despite a government decision then that it would not rescue or bailout troubled or struggling Malaysian companies.

KPB (now known as Pos Logistics Bhd) was one of the local companies affected by the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.

Anwar (who was then Minister of Finance) said KPB's principal activity at that time was the provision of shipping and container haulage services, and the company had net liabilities of almost RM424 million then.

Anwar said KPB had then approached him for financial assistance but the requested was rejected.

However, he said Dr Mahathir then directed him to devise a special scheme for the purpose of disbursing approximately RM2 billion from the Treasury for the purpose of assisting KPB.

He said Dr Mahathir became upset when he was told that a supplementary budget would have to be presented in Parliament for approval if he wished to proceed with the bailout plan.

Subsequent to that, Anwar said he was later informed by former President and Chief Executive Officer of Petronas that Dr Mahathir had directed the company to bail out KPB.

The prime minister also cited the awarding of a Telekom Malaysia Bhd contract worth RM214 million to Opcom Cables Sdn Bhd, a company with Dr Mahathir's sons and daughter-in-law as directors.

He said the contract was awarded even before the formation of a new cabinet and without its approval.

Justifying his allegation of cronyism, Anwar cited the case of Perwaja Steel which suffered massive losses in 1995.

He said based on the management accounts as at Dec 31, the group had net liabilities of RM926 million, long-term liabilities of RM6 billion and deficit in shareholders' funds of close to RM1.9 billion.

Anwar said he tabled a motion in parliament in December 1996 to approve the injection of RM2 billion for Perwaja Group and for the management of the company to be supervised.

Anwar said Dr Mahathir had given Chia a free hand to run the Perwaja Group which resulted in the group becoming insolvent and burdening the Ministry of Finance with liabilities of close to RM6 billion at that time.

He claimed Anwar made the impugned statement in his speech during PKR's special national congress held at the Melawati Stadium in Shah Alam on March 18. During the special congress, Anwar had referred to someone "who in the past had been in power for 22 years and an additional 22 months" as taking advantage of his position to enrich himself and his family.

Dr Mahathir said he has never been accused or convicted of any wrongdoing involving power abuse or misuse of funds either during or after serving as prime minister.

totokreturn.

pe benda ni, ko nak tempek english pi buka dekat lowyat la, dahulu kan bahasa ibunda kita

Orix

gudluck la bangnon... semoga tak makan diri sendiri... knowing kau punya akal vs atok punya akal, kau bawah tapak kaki atok jurrrrrrrrrrrr

ResellerMaxis

Petronas and MISC bailout konsortium perkapalan
Petronas bailout pos logistic berhad
TM award contract kepada opcom sebelum lantik kabinet 22 bulan
Parliament approved bailout perwaja steel.

Yang last tu patut hukum semua ahli parlimen yang approve. Then apa kaitan Chia dengan keluarga tun m. Kata tun m jadi pm kayakan anak beranak.

2 bailout tu kena panggil pimpinan glc tersebut. Kenapa bailout. Sebab anak tun m or business decision. What the out come. Make money or loss money?

TM award project pada opcom tu. Kena panggil management ke mahkamah gak lah. Awat award ke syarikat anak pm. Pm suruh ke?

ResellerMaxis

Orix replied at 15-6-2023 04:39 PM
gudluck la bangnon... semoga tak makan diri sendiri... knowing kau punya akal vs atok punya akal, ka ...

In 10 years bila PMX xjadi pm lagi. Siapa jadi kerajaan time tu. Boleh bangkitkan kes PMX bailout LCS. Dah ar x bincang dalam parlimen. Nak bincang pun speaker reject. Bailout sesuka hati.

Orix

ResellerMaxis replied at 15-6-2023 05:01 PM
In 10 years bila PMX xjadi pm lagi. Siapa jadi kerajaan time tu. Boleh bangkitkan kes PMX bailout  ...

Lantik anak sendiri jd punahsihat muntri kewangan pun kira award jugaklah kan. award jawatan ke anak sundri

pengecatbintang

ResellerMaxis replied at 15-6-2023 05:01 PM
In 10 years bila PMX xjadi pm lagi. Siapa jadi kerajaan time tu. Boleh bangkitkan kes PMX bailout  ...

Boustead Holdings Berhad (Boustead)

Listed on Bursa Malaysia in 1961, Boustead is a leading Government-linked company (GLC) in which Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT) is the majority shareholder, has total assets in excess of RM18.8 billion and more than 17,000 employees.

salah ke DSAI bailout GLC yg majoriti shareholder LTAT?

naper Abahcow & Tun x pertikai?

ResellerMaxis

pengecatbintang replied at 15-6-2023 05:50 PM
Boustead Holdings Berhad (Boustead)

Selama ni dia kan tentang bailout. Baik tolong orang miskin. 2 billion tu kalau bagi pada tentera lagi baik.

plywood

Woah best best

pengecatbintang

ResellerMaxis replied at 15-6-2023 05:53 PM
Selama ni dia kan tentang bailout. Baik tolong orang miskin. 2 billion tu kalau bagi pada tentera  ...

LTAT adalah sebuah badan berkanun kerajaan yang menyediakan kemudahan skim simpanan persaraan untuk Pegawai dan anggota lain-lain pangkat Angkatan Tentera Malaysia serta anggota kerahan sukarela.

askar2 Mesia ahli LTAT..

so, DSAI ahli LTAT tak?

ko wat laporan bailout ni kat polis or SPRM

nnt ko yg kena gelak ramai2 satu Mesia

Abahcow n Tun pong akan gelak sama

kakikuDibibirmu

saka atokcow ijau mumia fosil sukom98tahun tersenyum sinis

pengecatbintang

bak kata cai2 lombu Pee Een..

BRING IT ON...

haa kan..

itu hari masing2 kemain eksyen..

x brani komen kat thread ni...

nganga semua cai2 lombu

kemaruk

Deja vu

Sebelum PRU15 aritu pon berkobar kobar semangat dedahkan skandal LCS, nak dakwa azam baki bagai

Sekarang sendu jah..

Macam tak biasa dengan MO puak2 penghasut

ResellerMaxis

pengecatbintang replied at 15-6-2023 05:56 PM
LTAT adalah sebuah badan berkanun kerajaan yang menyediakan kemudahan skim simpanan persaraan untuk ...

Xyah buat cerita bohong sangat.. yang di bailout bukan tabung ltat. Tu iol kata dari bailout baik bagi duit direct dekat tentera.

Boulstead tu top management crony dsai. Sebab tu dia bailout

ResellerMaxis

pengecatbintang replied at 15-6-2023 06:25 PM
bak kata cai2 lombu Pee Een..

BRING IT ON...

Iol yakin atuk dah xsabar nak tulis jawapan untuk satu satu kes tu.

pengecatbintang

ResellerMaxis replied at 15-6-2023 06:33 PM
Xyah buat cerita bohong sangat.. yang di bailout bukan tabung ltat. Tu iol kata dari bailout baik  ...

ha ha ha...

yg buat LCS anak syarikat Boustead

pemegang saham terbesar Boustead adalah LTAT

anggota LTAT adalah askar Mesia

lagik satu...

Boustead ni GLC mcm Telekom, TNB

kalo Telekom n TNB lingkop...

Gomen patut bailout tak?

pengecatbintang

ResellerMaxis replied at 15-6-2023 06:34 PM
Iol yakin atuk dah xsabar nak tulis jawapan untuk satu satu kes tu.

bak kata cai2 Pee Een

BRING IT ON

ResellerMaxis

pengecatbintang replied at 15-6-2023 06:37 PM
ha ha ha...

yg buat LCS anak syarikat Boustead

The decision to provide a bailout should not be determined based on the owner's identity, but rather on an evaluation of risk and reward, particularly considering the impact on the people and the country.

When considering the possibility of bankruptcy, it is crucial to assess the number of job losses and the effects on both the people and the nation. However, the existence of socso, which covers job loss for six months, reduces the significance of the number of individuals losing their jobs. They are provided with socso coverage during the transitional period before seeking new opportunities.

In the event of TM (Telekom Malaysia) going bankrupt and millions of people facing the risk of being unable to access the internet, the government should evaluate the cost of a bailout and explore alternative methods of providing internet services. Assessing the short-term and long-term risks and rewards associated with both options is essential.

It is important to consider whether TM's shares have the potential to increase in value in the future, thereby offering favorable returns to the government. Alternatively, it is necessary to assess the likelihood of share prices continuing to decline, resulting in repeated bailouts over time.

If there is a competing company like Time that has the capability to replace TM using private funding instead of government resources, and can ensure uninterrupted internet supply to affected individuals before TM ceases its operations, that should be taken into account.

A good example to consider is the case of MAS (Malaysia Airlines). It is worth noting the substantial amount of money invested by Khazanah in MAS, which has resulted in considerable financial losses.

nw111

Orix replied at 15-6-2023 04:39 PM
gudluck la bangnon... semoga tak makan diri sendiri... knowing kau punya akal vs atok punya akal, ka ...

Bukan non kata atok sakau biliyun2 ke...ingat ada bukti money trail ka, bank statement ka dlm kotak yg dh lama dia simpan tu..

puan_rohayu

Aku fhm macam ni
Satu contoh mudah
Pengetua sebuah sekolah ada anak lelaki yg mmg businessman cleaning service,boleh tak dia masuk tender pembersihan dimana ayah dia ada kuasa utk memilih siapa yg layak dpt tender, jawapannya tentu tidak.Klu dapat ke anak lelaki dia dan org report, Pengetua itu akan didakwa salah guna kuasa.Tetapi klu anaknya tender kontrak pembersihan itu di sekolah lain atau daerah lain boleh ke tak tentulah boleh jawapannya.
Skrg kes ini anak2 tun M ni mmg dah sedia businessman yg berjaya semasa dia mula jd PM? project2 kerajaan diorg dapat adakah Tun M salah seorg yg blh approved tender2 tersebut ?klu DSAI dpt buktikan di mahkamah  dari kontrak pemerolehan projek2 anak2 tun M itu Tun M adalah salah seorg yg membuat keputusan.Salah guna kuasa la tu..
Lain la anak2 tun M jadi businessesman di luar negara dan dpt project2 negara luar.