Jawapan Balas Kerajaan Sarawak Kepada Perdana Menteri Persekutuan Malaysia

cmf_shalom

sranua replied at 8-1-2019 12:59 PM
Wow thread ni sangat menarik dan informatif. Aku jadi suka baca banyak ttg hak Sarawak dan Sabah dal ...

Thanks sis. Mbe after ni.. Psl srwk or sabah ak letak dlm sini je..

cmf_shalom

keronsang replied at 8-1-2019 10:32 AM
Bila baca the whole comments.. sgt kesian kt sabah & sarawak  x boleh ke uruskan the whole  ...

Thanks...

ak x berani nk ckp semua benda yg ak tulis 100% tepat.. If ada yg x betul mohon kaunter bserta ngan data n fakta... Jgn was2 utk bgitau

Skiranya ada ayat emosi bagai tu..maafkan la...ak dilahirkan kt dunia bukan surga...kikkkiki..tp ak try utk diskus ngan mood baik..

cmf_shalom

Padan muka PH.. Teruskan la menekan sarawak... Kan dh jadi bahan utk korg..



Sokong GPS Untuk Pastikan Projek Dibatalkan PH Diteruskan

RAKYAT Sarawak tidak sepatutnya memberi peluang kepada orang luar memimpin negeri ini kerana boleh merencatkan proses pembangunan dirancang.

Ahli Parlimen Santubong, Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar berkata, kerajaan persekutuan di bawah Pakatan Harapan (PH) membatalkan banyak projek diluluskan ketika era Barisan Nasional (BN) sebelum ini.

Bagaimanapun menurutnya, atas inisiatif Ketua Menteri Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Tun Openg, projek prasarana tersebut diluluskan untuk manfaat rakyat.

Sehubungan itu jelasnya, sekiranya orang luar diberi peluang memimpin, sudah pasti projek yang diilhamkan kerajaan negeri ketika ini mungkin dibatalkan.

Tambahnya, penubuhan Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) memang tepat pada masanya dalam usaha mempertahankan hak Sarawak dalam Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 (MA63).

Wan Junaidi menambah, pemulangan balik hak-hak yang sepatutnya diterima penting bagi memastikan pembangunan Sarawak setanding negeri lain di Semenanjung Malaysia.

Tegasnya, kerajaan persekutuan sepatutnya meneruskan penyaluran dana kepada Sarawak terutama melibatkan projek jalan raya, jambatan, klinik dan sekolah.

Beliau berkata demikian pada Jelajah Bendera GPS di Dewan Suarah Lundu hari ini.

#iamSarawakian #IbuPertiwiku #GPS FLAG RALLY 2019

cmf_shalom

Protecting special rights of Borneo Territories

January 27, 2019, Sunday at 12:02 AM Alex Ling, MA LLB (CANTAB)

Necessary to amend Federal Constitution and Acts based conformity to five tiers of unique constitutional entrenched provisions and promulgations of parliamentary legislations

PART I(A)

WHAT are the constitutional entrenched provisions for the Borneo Territories that the Federal government must comply?

The federal government has to comply with the five tiers of unique constitutional entrenched provisions for the amendments of the FC (Federal Constitution) and promulgations of parliamentary legislations for the Borneo Territories, thereby qualifying the Malaysian parliamentary sovereignty.

Tier one is MA1963, namely Chapter 3 on the IGC Report 1962, Article V on immigration and Article VIII with the Annexes A to K and the three fundamental assurances and undertakings of Tun Razak on 3rd August 1962 of no domination by KL which would always consult them as equal partners, pivotal to Sarawak joining in the formation of Malaysia.

The second tier is Annex A to the MA1963, namely the Malaysia Bill (‘MB’) which provides that the most critical provisions identical to the FC must be amended first before amending the actual provisions of the FC, such as Article 4 on the ‘States and Territories’ of MB identical to Article 1 of the FC. Article 9 of MB is identical to Article 46 of FC (no two-third rule); Article 42 of MB is identical to 95D of the FC (excluding parliament to make laws on land and local government of the Borneo Territories); Article 46 of MB on special grants is identical to Article 112C. Article 47 of MB is identical to Article 112D on Reviews of Special Grants and Article 66, particularly Article 66(3) related to Quotas under Article 9 of MB is identical to Article 161E(3) on the safeguards for constitutional position of Borneo States as equal partners, not to be relegated toas satellite states similar to individual states of Malayawhich per se prohibits the passing of Act 354, apart from the mandatory approvals of their respective legislative councils under Article 2 of the FC for the alteration of boundaries and status.

The third tier is that parliament is forbidden to pass laws touching on land and local governments of the Borneo States nor on the compulsory acquisition of land and O&G by federal under Articles 95D, 76(4), Items 2(a) and 2(d) and no right to issue licences eg PSC on O&G under 2(c) of the Ninth Schedule State List and the rest of the 7FCsunder its continental shelf to 350 nautical miles, as Article 13 of the FC only applies to the States of Malaya and the Federal Territories without such entrenched constitutional provisions and protections. Unlike Westminster before joining EU, the Malaysian parliamentary sovereignty is subject to the fivetiers constitutional entrenched provisions to safeguard the enshrined rights and privileges of the Borneo States.

The fourth tier is the seven protective municipal laws of Sarawak (7PMs) with Article 162(1) and (2) which over-ride Article 75 of the FC.

The last tier is namely the special powers in the specific provisions of the FC where the legislative councils of the respective Borneo Territories must give mandatory consents for any amendments of the FC, such as under Articles 4 and 9 of MB and Articles2, 80(3) and 7FCs entrenched provisions of the FC or promulgations of parliamentary legislations for examples under Articles 2 and the rest of 7FCs under the three pillars, namely Rule of Law, constitutional parliamentary democracy and Malaysian parliamentary sovereignty, subject to the fivetiers of entrenched provisions.

Naturally, the amicable settlement would be based on 7FCs and 7PMs even with the production quotas under the National Depletion Policies (NDP), unlikely to be implemented now or ever when oil recovery is only 29 pct and gas (40 pct bol). O&G are finite resources.

Under the Rule of Law, whether formal or substantive, proclaimed by the PM to be viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behaviour, therefore the federal government and institution of Petronas under a public company would be equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes, the five tiers of constitutional entrenched provisions including the 7FCs and 7PMs.

What experts the state and Petros would need on negotiating on MA63 and its O&G?

There will be various technical issues on O&G and various aspects on the legal issue, corporate restructuring, fiscal and financial models with the breakdowns of the financial costs and analysis, sums & parts, EBITA and IRR and others including the records of each production wells and share profit or split barrels of O&G. Experienced and top O&G consultants, legal, financial and fiscal experts familiar with Petronas’s models and operation of PSCs need to be engaged to negotiate for the maximum understanding, exposure and benefits to be worked out fairly for Petros and Sarawak government as the dominion of its O&G which is entitled to the detailed profit and loss accounts since Sarawak has a director on the Board of Petronas under the Companies Act. A Queen Counsel (QC) from London and Australia would be necessary to advise the state government on the restoration of O&G, revision and reformation on MA1963. The QC will appear for the state if litigation becomes inevitable after the failure of the legal and political settlement.

What are the state’s right as the dominion of its O&G? Any further actions to take?

For the state government (1)(a) has the right to issue and re-issue all PSCs in Sarawak with options to farm in with pre-emption rights in all cases under OMAO(2018), SLC1958 and rest of 7FCs, 7PMs and Article 76 of UNCLOS.

Adoption of Section 48(a) of Minerals Ordinance 2004 to protect and prevent lacuna-gap between expiry of all licences/leases and quarry licences because of the delay in the system

(1)(b) The state government needs to expand and refine the procedures on the renewals of PSCs under Section 14 of the Oil Mining (Amendment) Ordinance 2018 (OMAO 2018) up to international standard O&G legislations for investors’ confidence to prevent inherentinevitable bureaucratic procedure causing delays or otherwise as happened in the Third World Countries, for mining or winning of oil, minerals and stone quarries by adopting Section 48(9) of the federal Minerals Ordinance 2004 (MO 2004), in the OMO (Amendment) 2018 and amendment of the outdatedLand Code Section 32A for quarries with no renewal provision, namely if the application is made before 12 months before expiry, “but for this subsection expire, the lease or license or PSC and other license shall continue in respect of the land to which the application relates until the application is determined, by the Sarawak Minerals Management Authority (SMMA).”

The late Tan Sri Lim Keng Yaik, the Minister of the Primary Industries, accepted the writer’s suggestion decades ago for this provision in the MO2014 for normal renewals of mining leases or certificates. O&G and quarry were excluded, perhaps due to an oversight. Article 3A of OMOA2018 should include any marine structures, not only mining for O&Gin Sarawak’s continental shelf to prevent future ‘acquisition of territories’ and natural resources. A light house can even be critical under international law.

Exploration and development need much longer period on licence which must be agreed beforehand. Why?

On exploration licences of 2 years under Sections 15 to 18 of OMAO(2018),the time period would require refinement and extension by following Petronas’s international exploration and developmentsperiod to commensurate the high risky investment at the front unlike normal hard rock mining for O&G to renew or to issue or to reissue the present PSCs or oil mining licences or leases withall the terms and conditions stipulated on them to attract international and local investors on very risky and expensive 3D seismic and offshore drilling of US$20 million a hole averagebefore discovery. Five years for exploration, 4 years developments and production 20 years and for deep waters, the exceptional drilling cost of US $100 per hole with 4 years exploration, 6 years for development and 25 years on production would be fair and the international standard norm for serious investors in O&G. The terms of royalty capital allowances, R/C Index, threshold volume, abandonment costs, 15 pct IRR, deductions, taxes with back to backof the 4th generation PSCs ofPetronas formula have to be agreed in writing in the licences/PSCs before investors would go on explorations in modern O&G format with two minimum drilling holes with or without signature bonus.Now, there is only one stop, not licences and leases. Terms must be clear and certain ab initio.

Should practice of backdating the licences and leases a lacuna until Section 48(a) of MO2004 be applicable to O&G and quarry?

Yes. The old practice was to backdate the oil licences or mining leases or stone quarry licences (sometimes) from the last expiry date until the leases or licenses actually were approved and issued retrospectively by dating the leases back to back to the expiry date while allowing the interim period to be valid for winning of oil, mining and stone quarrying because it took a long time or some time to process from the Divisional, then to the Headquarter of Land and Survey Department up to the State Minerals Committee, later SMMAwith approvals of mining and quarrying plans and the approvals of NREB in successive stages before mining leases approved by the cabinet for TYT previously, to sign and all the way down, taking a few years, as specified in the Petroleum Mining Act 1966 (except for quarry licences).

Now mining leases though simplified and shortened are subject to NREB and Mine Rehabilitation Plan(MRP) being approved in sequence before theissuances of licences or leases after approvalsonly for subsequent operations. So there are always onerous delays with inevitable expensive stoppages of operations waiting for renewals from 6 months to 1 or 2 years, due to sequential paperworks in stages. Any MRP for offshore O&G operations apart from cementing the holes? Onland O&G is mining too with environmental pre-approvals and compliance with native customary laws.

The adoption of Section 48(9) of OM 2004 would obviate the necessity of cabinet in approving the renewals of O&G leases/PSCs. Cabinet does not get involved with approvals of O&G under international practice.

NREB would normally follow this practice despite this lacuna unless the Land and Survey has specifically terminated the leases or license under the directives from Land and Survey directed by SMMA. (2) Imposing 20 pct affordable royalty now by way of local sales tax inclusive of its by-products exported. (3) An increase of 2.5 pct royalty after 10 years and another 2.5 pct or more out of share profit or split barrel of O&G after 15 years or after plugging partly the one trillion financial hole.(4) Equity cash flow up to 4 pct (5) Right to impose international practice of bonus signature.Petronashas abolished it including fees and area rentals.(6) Right to impose state sales tax under Item 7 of Part V 10th Schedule and Article 95B(3) as royalty before Item 3 of Part V is amended by parliament based on the sale prices of O&G not ad valorem nor with specified percentage besides the four taxes on O&G and state equity cash flows.

A new full-bodied international oil licensing agreement with Petronas and others

(7) A new full-bodied standard international oil agreement with a revision clause needs to be executed in the royalty agreement to replace the two-page Oil Agreement (8) The constitutional right to impose local sales tax on downstream products apart from O&G per se, was announced by YAB CM of Sarawak to be imposed in January 2019, namely 5 pct on O&G, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, chemical based fertilizers and gas to liquid productsexported, not affecting local consumers. (9) If the legal and political settlement fails, the state can or would impose another 10 pct local sale tax totalling 20 pct affordable royalty or equivalent by local sale tax eventually to replace the royalty as amplified abovewhenever necessary out of thefirst affordable three profit centres, namely the share profit or split barrels of O&G about 35 pct to 53 pct of pure revenue of the federal which Petronas sells for the federal,not from the 4 taxes and Petronas’s separate profit centre and dividends.

BP

cmf_shalom

Bedah.Cun

cmf_shalom replied at 2-12-2018 10:51 PM
Sebelum ini, sebelum menang PRU, atok ni selalu kutuk ayah Najib yang merompak Sarawak..nanti aku ca ...

Ai tolong, yea. Istilah yg sinonim dgn si tua kutookk tue adalah lidah bewakk haram jadahh.

cmf_shalom

Bedah.Cun replied at 29-1-2019 06:39 PM
Ai tolong, yea. Istilah yg sinonim dgn si tua kutookk tue adalah lidah bewakk haram jadahh.

Yup bedah..sikap TUn spt ini menyebabkan aku tidak teragak2 untuk mengutuk Tun.

Sebagai orang tua berumur 93 tahun..sikap yang ditunjukkan oleh Tun bukan seperti yang tua yang selayaknya.

Tun terang-terang petik nama ayah Najib..tanpa rasa simpati...tapi selama 22 tahun apa Tun buat? Akhirnya Sarawak kena tunggu Najib, untukl tarik semua warta darurat, termasuk darurat 13 Mei yang digunakan untuk menguatkuasa PDA.

Najib pula, terbuka untuk membetulkan kesilapan ayah dia..sementara tun sewenang-wenang menyebut ayah najib sebagai perompak.

Tun sebaliknya, selama 22 tahun lansung tidak hendak menarik warta darurat, kerana dia tau, bila darurat ditarik balik, PDA pun hilang kuasa.

Tun  adalah seoranf kiasu. Dia menumpang kesenangan di atas orang yang dia sendiri cop sebagai perompak, tanpa rasa bersalah.

Sebelum PRU, Untuk meraih undi, dia sanggup menyebut ayah najib sebagai perompak. Tapi selepas dia menang, dia tidak teragak-agak mengugut Sarawak.
Dia menuduh ayah najib perompok, tapi selama 22 tahun Tun membangunkan Putrajaya/KLCC hasil daripada rompakan tersebut.Malahan, dia menuntut rakyat kena berterima kasih kepada dia.

Sebab itu,  dia tidak layan menerima penghormatan dari aku.

cmf_shalom

Sarawak bina dua jambatan sungai terpanjang

SARAWAK bakal memiliki dua jambatan sungai terpanjang di Malaysia, masing-masing Jambatan Batang Lupar dan Jambatan Batang Paloh, tidak lama lagi.

Ia sebahagian daripada komponen pelengkap jalan pesisir sepanjang 900 kilometer menghubungkan wilayah selatan dan utara negeri ini, khususnya di kawasan pesisir Bumi Kenyalang.

Difahamkan, Jambatan Batang Lupar dijangka mencecah jarak antara 4.5 hingga lima kilometer, manakala Jambatan Batang Paloh berukuran 1.7 kilometer panjang.

Sebuah lagi jambatan yang sedang dirancang pembinaannya ialah Jambatan Muara Lassa mencecah jarak 2.43 kilometer.

Semua jambatan baharu ini dibina dua lorong yang dijangka mampu memudahkan pergerakan penduduk di kawasan pesisir.

Menteri Muda Pembangunan Infrastruktur (Jalan Pesisir) Sarawak, Datuk Julaihi Narawi berkata, inisiatif itu memperlihatkan komitmen kerajaan negeri membawa kemajuan kepada rakyat, terutama di kawasan pedalaman dan luar bandar.

Malah, katanya, kerajaan negeri di bawah kepemimpinan Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) yakin hanya melalui kaedah itu, pembangunan di kawasan pedalaman dan luar bandar dapat dipercepatkan, begitu juga pelaksanaan pelbagai projek lain di bawah Program Transformasi Luar Bandar (RTP).

“Hanya melalui sistem perhubungan yang cekap, khususnya pembinaan jalan pesisir ini bersama jambatan penghubung, kita dapat mewujudkan akses kepada kemajuan di sesebuah kawasan pedalaman dan luar bandar.

“Ini secara tidak langsung merangsang pertumbuhan sosio-ekonomi setempat, seterusnya meningkatkan taraf hidup penduduk, selain memudahkan pergerakan kehidupan harian mereka,” katanya ketika dihubungi, hari ini.

Julaihi yang juga Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Sebuyau berkata, Kerajaan Sarawak mahu menghubungkan jalan pesisir itu dengan semua penempatan di kawasan pesisir, begitu juga meningkatkan sistem perhubungan darat di kawasan pedalaman dan luar bandar lain di negeri ini.

“Ini termasuk pembinaan Jambatan Batang Paloh akan menjadi jambatan kedua terpanjang di Sarawak selepas Jambatan Batang Lupar,” katanya.

Beliau berkata, semua projek pembinaan jambatan di sepanjang jajaran jalan pesisir di Sarawak kini diambilalih oleh kerajaan negeri selepas ditangguhkan Kerajaan Persekutuan atas alasan kekangan kewangan.

“Kerajaan Sarawak meneruskan semua projek itu, di atas inisiatif digerakkan Ketua Menteri, Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Abang Openg kerana menyedari kepentingannya yang amat diperlukan oleh rakyat,” katanya.

Sementara itu, Kampung Tekajong, Kampung Salah Kecil dan Kampung Penuai di Tanjung Manis akan dihubungkan melalui projek jalan pesisir itu.

Katanya, kerja-kerja pembinaan laluan sepanjang 16.1 kilometer itu bermula pertengahan tahun lalu dan dijangka siap menjelang pertengahan tahun depan membabitkan peruntukan RM19.3 juta.

Artikel ini disiarkan pada : Jumaat, 1 Februari 2019 @ 11:39 AM

MyMetro

cmf_shalom

Activist says Sabah leaders now mute on revenue owed by Putrajaya


KOTA KINABALU: A Sabah activist has questioned ruling politicians in the state for “going silent” on the issue of returning money owed by the federal government, despite championing the issue before the general election last year.

“Even Warisan deputy president Darell Leiking, who is now the international trade and industry minister, said before that the federal government owed Sabah RM1 trillion under MA63,” said activist Jamain Sarudin from Solidariti Rakyat Pro-Sabah, referring to the Malaysia Agreement of 1963.

“Now he has gone quiet. If those allied with the federal government are not heard, what more those who are outside that circle,” he added.

His comments come after former foreign minister Anifah Aman urged Putrajaya to pay what is due to Sabah and Sarawak, following Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng’s announcement of a record collection in direct taxes.


Last week, Lim said the government collected RM137.035 billion in direct tax collections in 2018, more than the previous government’s record of RM133.700 billion set in 2014.

Anifah said the amount would be enough to pay what Putrajaya owed the two states.

Under the Federal Constitution, Sabah is entitled to receive 40% of the net revenue derived by the federal government in the state.

In November, Lim said Putrajaya had wanted to give Sabah its 40% revenue but did not have enough funds to do so.

Another activist said it was unlikely that Putrajaya would channel the billions from the tax revenue to the two states.

“It is constitutionally mandatory for the federal government to pay the 40% to Sabah,” said former state assemblyman James Ligunjang, referring to the 40% net revenue promised by the federal government to Sabah as stated in MA63.


If Putrajaya does not pay up, he warned, “the people of Sabah will get more angry with the federal government”.

“It’s been going on for 55 years now and the federal government can no longer brush aside this constitutional provision. We need the funds for our development,” he said.

Jamain said the 40% from the amount collected would constitute about RM40 billion to Sabah.

“I support the call by Anifah or any other who fights for Sabah’s rights, including Warisan, but I doubt the federal government will entertain this call.”

He said the federal government had previously given excuses, citing the country’s debt and the need for more funds before the revenue is returned. It had also said that Sabah does not need it for now, he added.
FMT

palmolive

cmf_shalom replied at 8-1-2019 11:06 AM
Lepas kekah hak org... Then tanya bila nk kluar malaysia?

Boleh... Jual dulu putrjaya... Klcc ...

kamu org ok lg la..royalti tak tukar nama kepada Wang Ehsan
angkara saper

cmf_shalom

palmolive replied at 12-2-2019 05:36 PM
kamu org ok lg la..royalti tak tukar nama kepada Wang Ehsan
angkara saper

Nmpak gayanya, peluang jadi PM kali ke-2 adalah satu bala...

Temberang setiap hari makin pecah

cmf_shalom

Hats off to S’wak

February 13, 2019, Wednesday at 12:00 AM Abdul Hakim Bujang, reporters@theborneopost.com

Tax on natural resources reflects true value of what Sarawak owns, economist points out

KUCHING: The Sarawak government has been praised for introducing its own sales tax for petroleum products.

Stressing that economic growth is about strategy and bold decision, Associate Professor Dr Fatimah Kari of Universiti Malaya (UM) said Sarawak is actually deprived of the profits of the true value of its resources despite being at the top of the country’s social prosperity indicator by virtue of its position as an oil and gas producer.

Despite having resources such as oil and gas, “the sharing of wealth that benefits the producer state was minimal,” she pointed out.

She was asked to comment on the impact of Sarawak-produced oil and gas on the state’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), pointing out it is taken away by Putrajaya which creates an “outwardly rich but inwardly poor impression of the state.”

“The Sarawak government has announced an expansionary 2019 budget of about RM9.07 billion and this is a good move.

“Introducing the sales tax on items such as O&G and minerals, which is expected to generate RM4.4 billion, is a good economic move,” she said.  “The fact that the state of  Sarawak is able to identify new tax/revenue area reflects pragmatism by our planners,” she added.

She stressed that the tax move is a global trend as can be seen in many Scandinavian countries, whereby tax on natural resources is relatively common to properly reflect the true value of what the nation owns.

The senior economist, who has published and presented many scholarly papers in the area of Environment and Poverty, Poverty Indexing and Environment and Growth, however warned that the state must also design strategies that do not depend too much on fossil fuels which will soon be a thing of the past.

She also reminded that Sarawak must design new development models especially to develop the rural areas with strong focus on education, road, water and electricity supply – which are basic needs.

“It is time for Sarawak to adopt development model based on the need to develop human resources while being trade and investment orientated state.

“Sarawak’s entry into the global market must continue to be developed more directly – both physically and negotiation-wise,” she advised.

Sarawak, she added, must move towards skill-based, value-added manufacturing sectors which are knowledge intensive.

“Never ever depend on sectors that employ cheap foreign labour – these are old model that will not create returns.”

She also stressed that Sarawak must allow rural development to become the anchor for new regional growth – with strong emphasis on technology, human resource, job creation and employment and wealth sharing.

“Yes, it can be done. All of these are not mere illusion as Sarawakians determine the destiny of our state,” she stressed.

The Senior Fellow of the Social Policy Unit in Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas) also lamented that federalism provides a biased development focus and allocation for Sabah and Sarawak.

“This is worsened by political control of the federal government as reflected in the case of the existence of poorer/low income states/less developed states such as Kelantan, Sabah and Sarawak,” she pointed out.

The former director of the Centre for Poverty and Development Studies (CPDS), UM revealed that most of development literature and many academicians discussed on the lop-sided and bias of federalism which contributed to uneven growth.

“Within the context of centre-periphery/state-federal relationship, the periphery – states such as Sabah, Sarawak and Kelantan are far less developed than the centre – Selangor and Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur,” she said.

She further cautioned the state government not to repeat past mistakes especially in the areas of bad and wasteful public fund investment such as in providing new growth areas/public amenities (water supply) as what had happened in Tanjung Manis.

“If the lopsided impact of federalism worsens inequality, bad governance and weak monitoring and evaluation on public investment will continue to widen disparity among regions and the rakyat,” she cautioned.

Catatan:

ermmmm blum jumpa lagi alasan...ni semua salah Taib

palmolive

cmf_shalom replied at 12-2-2019 05:55 PM
Nmpak gayanya, peluang jadi PM kali ke-2 adalah satu bala...

Temberang setiap hari makin pe ...

memang bala...tp rakyat malaysia seolah2 baru kenal PM ni

cmf_shalom

Jambatan Bako bernilai RM53 juta akan dirasmikan oleh Abang Jo ahad ini

Kuching: Jambatan Bako sepanjang 280m akan dirasmikan oleh Ketua Menteri Sarawak ahad ini bertempat di perkarangan jambatan bako.

Jambatan yang bernilai RM53 juta tersebut adalah hasil usaha Allahyarham Tok Nan. Jambatan tersebut menghubungkan Kampung Bako di seberang sungai dengan laluan utama yang menghubungkan ia dengan bandaraya Kuching.

Dengan siapnya jambatan tersebut ia akan menjadi nadi penting buat penduduk Kampung Bako dan menjadi pemangkin utama pertumbuhan dan pembangunan ekonomi di kawasan nelayan berkenaan.

- Kamek Miak Sarawak-

Nak ke xnk..rakyat sarawak kena berterima kasih kepada Najib...bukan aku nak backup najib..or nak puji lebih2..kalau patut dipuji memang patut pun..

Baru balik..sempat melihat sendiri perkembangan projek pan Borneo dari Sarikei ke Bintulu...memang tengah rancak berjalan...Jalan menghubung kapit pun telah ada.,..cuma dimaklumkan sebahagian belum bertar...tapi dah boleh dilalui..

Jambatan Durin pun tengah upgrade

Cuma, yang x sedap dengar, berlaku pemotongan peruntukan oleh PH...termasuk gaji pekerja....jangan ada yg mogok projek ini tertangguh..bertambah berat guni Tun nak bawa nanti...

Jalan masuk ke pekan-pekan seperti pakan, julau, kanowit etc..rancak dibina flyover

Terus terang aku cakap...xde seorang sebut nama Tun...semuanya cakap ini jasa Najib...Tun? nama dia cukup sinomin dengan tukang potong bajet/projek/menyusahkan penduduk luar bandar..

Aku tidak pikir if  ada penyokong PH yang berada di Sarawak boleh kaunter apa yang aku tulis ini.

cmf_shalom

Untuk makluman korg,

Bentuk dan keadaan jalan persekutuan pada zaman Tun di Sarawak adalah lebih kurang macam ni..mungkin lebar skit..xde bezakan dengan kalimantan, Indonesia:



Ni keadaan jalan Persekutuan, Pan Borneo sekarang



Kat  Bintulu

cmf_shalom

Nak cakap najib merasuah rakyat Sarawak sila-sila..


selama 22 tahun, TUN pun merasuah rakyat malaya dengan pelbagai kesedapan dunia..RM50=penuh 1 troli..

dasar kabotaj aka sabotaj malaya pd zaman TUN menyebabkan rakyat sabah/sarawak menikmati harga mahal berganda-ganda dari malaya

btw...sekali lagi, aku bukan pro najib..

kalau memang patut dipuji..x salah utk dikenangkan..

selama 22 tahun Tun mcekik duit rakyat, dan serah pentadbiran negara dalam keadaan nyawa nyawa ikan kepada Pak Lah

Mierafaziera

cmf_shalom replied at 19-2-2019 10:16 AM
Jambatan Bako bernilai RM53 juta akan dirasmikan oleh Abang Jo ahad iniKuching: Jambatan Bako sepanj ...

tumpang happy for Sarawakian...co. tpt I keja ni involves dalam Projek Pan Borneo Sabah & Sarawak.dan jugak latest Sarawak Coastal Highway..happy for you guys!!!

cmf_shalom

Mierafaziera replied at 19-2-2019 10:41 AM
tumpang happy for Sarawakian...co. tpt I keja ni involves dalam Projek Pan Borneo Sabah & Sarawak. ...

Bagi rakyat Sarawak,

Saya nak ucapkan ribuan terima kasih tidak terhingga kepada syarikat Sis....

Sangat besar jasa sis kepada rakyat Sarawak/Sabah

Mbe bagi ssetengah ummah malaya, celik mata..terus nmpk hway yang besar...apa yg berlaku di Sabah/sarawak mcm tiada apa2..tp bagi kami..ia mmberi kehidupan....x payah nak cakap mambo jambo segala mentera pembangunan.wawasan 2020....if yang basic pun tidak disediakan..mengarut semua tu...batak likesssss

Bagi sarawakians sendiri...aku tidak kisah if ada yang pro PH..GPS ke apa...ini negara demokrasi...ak pun bukan pro GPS or PH...kt forum srwk..kuat juga aku mengkritik GPS. Lagipun PH sarawak , so far xde seteruk malaya..kecuali sikap kiatsu DAP sarawak jak...

tp if ada yang kagum ngan TUN..aku kompius...

Mierafaziera

cmf_shalom replied at 19-2-2019 10:46 AM
Bagi rakyat Sarawak,

Saya nak ucapkan ribuan terima kasih tidak terhingga kepada syarikat Sis.. ...

kitorang pun nak ucapkan jutaan tima kasih kat Sarawak sebab peluang ni...since infrastructure project di sini semua suspended, Sarawak bantu kami bernyawa selepas PRU14...Tqqqqqq!!!

cmf_shalom

Mierafaziera replied at 19-2-2019 11:14 AM
kitorang pun nak ucapkan jutaan tima kasih kat Sarawak sebab peluang ni...since infrastructure pro ...

hehe..semua kompeni dah lari ke Sarawak srkg...korg rebut la peluang ni..

Projek jambatan pun banyak juga, guna peruntukan kerajaan negeri.....2 antaranya bakal terpanjang kt malaysia kot..